Anyone Ever Had Their House Burn Down?

Red1

Member
What do we do when the fire fighters....won't?
Maybe have swat teams reconnoiter the area before allowing them in..to what? Sift the ashes? IF you can show your guns here...I should be able to show the results also....not trying to make trouble..only asking the question....

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/25/nyregion/2-firefighters-killed-in-western-new-york.html?hp&_r=0


Published: December 24, 2012

Four firefighters were shot — two fatally — after responding to an early morning blaze on Monday in Webster, N.Y., about 12 miles northeast of Rochester, officials said.
Connect with NYTMetro
Metro Twitter Logo.

Follow us on Twitter and like us on Facebook for news and conversation.

The suspected assailant also died at the scene, the Webster police chief, Gerald L. Pickering said, though it was unclear if he was killed by a self-inflicted gunshot or by the authorities.

“It does appear that it was a trap that was set,” Chief Pickering said of the blaze that drew the firefighters. “Causative reasons, we don’t have at this time.”

One of the firefighters was “able to flee the scene on his own,'’ he added. “The other three were pinned down at the location.”

Strong Memorial Hospital in Rochester said two firefighters were in “guarded condition.” The two others died at the scene, Chief Pickering said.

The firefighters were from the West Webster Fire Department, about four miles from the blaze, and were believed to be volunteers.

As he recited the names of the four firefighters at a news conference on Monday morning, Chief Pickering repeatedly choked up. One of the deceased, Michael J. Chiapperini, was a police lieutenant in the Webster Police Department.

“These people get up in the middle of the night to go put out fires,” he said. “They don’t expect to be shot and killed.”

An off-duty police officer from Greece, N.Y., who happened to be driving by and stopped to help suffered shrapnel wounds from the shooting, Chief Pickering added.

Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo said that the State Police and the Office of Emergency Management were working with local officials. He said that Webster firefighters and the police had initially responded to a car fire.

“New York’s first responders are true heroes as they time and again selflessly rush toward danger in order to keep our families and communities safe,” Mr. Cuomo said. “Volunteer firefighters and police officers were injured and two were taken from us as they once again answered the call of duty. We as the community of New York mourn their loss as now two more families must spend the holidays without their loved ones.”

The fire continued to burn through the morning, having spread to several homes. Four homes were fully engulfed and destroyed, and 33 area residents were evacuated, Chief Pickering said.

He added that, with authorities establishing and investigating the crime scene, “it took a while to make it safe” for firefighters to move in and combat the flames.

The site of the fire, Lake Road, runs along a narrow spit of land that divides Lake Ontario from Irondequoit Bay. The houses in the affected area are detached wood frame homes with yards, across the street from the lake.

Chief Pickering likened the area to “a little vacation nest.”

“We have very few calls for service in that location,” he said.

Michael D’Amico, a contractor who has lived on Lake Road for 20 years, said that residents were evacuated to a school. “We still can’t go back,” he said.

The area is home to many summer houses, he said, but some people lived there year-round.

“A lot of times I get woken up by gunfire, but I don’t think too much of it,” Mr. D’Amico said, noting that the area often attracted duck hunters.

“Usually the gunfire comes from the lake or the bay,” he added. “This was from further down the road.”

Vince DiPrima, an assistant manager at Bill Gray’s, a diner across the bridge from the fires, said some firefighters had visited his restaurant on Monday morning. He gave them some coffee.

“The stuff that happened in Connecticut the other day, and then this,” Mr. DiPrima said.

By noon, State Police helicopters swarmed overhead. Emergency vehicles zipped past.

“It’s a weird feeling,” Mr. DiPrima said. “It’s Christmas Eve.”
 
My Aunt worked for the Manassas VA EMS and they had some nut that would call and when they responded would shoot at them. Not sure why, or what would motivate someone to attack your emergency responders but they are out there.

Hope they find the shooter.

Aaron
 
These nut jobs should just go ahead and shoot themselves first. Better yet, kill themselves by any other means than a firearm!!
 
Invest in rope companys. I figure all the gullible people who maxed out their cards because the world was going to end, will have to hang themselves cause they won't be able to make the payments.
 
Yep turnabout is fair play in my book, and I am probably on the opposite side of the fence as you. However I sure don't believe in shooting innocent people especially those that put their lives on the line to help others. Hats off to the firefighters.
 
Dec 24, 2012 at 3:10 pm

The Webster, New York man who fired on firefighters responding to a blaze, killing two, is a felon convicted of manslaughter, according to local police. Webster Police Chief Gerald Pickering told a press conference this morning that the suspect was William Spengler, who served roughly 18 years on manslaughter charges for killing his 92 year old grandmother. Spengler had a number of run-ins with the police after that, according to Pickering.

[color=red:9d49f9a463]Because Spengler was convicted a felon, he was supposed to be legally barred from owning a gun. However, because of the so-called “gun show loophole” — a National Rifle Assocation (NRA) supported-policy that allows “private” gun sales to take place without background checks — it’s possible Spengler could have purchased his weapon without the seller even checking whether he could legally own a gun or had a history of violence. Guns bought in this manner are used in 80 percent of violent firearm crimes across the country. Moreover, it’s very easy, as a consequence of another set of NRA-supported changes to federal law, for some felons to get their right to own guns reinstated.[/color:9d49f9a463]

When asked about the nature of Spengler’s murderous assault on the firefighters, Pickering said that, from what they could tell so far, “it was a trap.”
 
A felon, "could have" also stolen it...as long as we are just making W.A.G es! :roll:
 
Seems to be an increasing violent World or its just more of it on the news.Anyway the real question is whether to disarm law abiding citizens
or not because strict gun control laws don't stop criminals and nut cases from getting guns and other weapons.Mexico proves that they have very strict gun laws and some of the most violent criminals that are heavily armed in the World.The larger cities in the US with the strictest gun laws have the most violence with guns.Laws against gun ownership will only leave the law abiding folks defenseless
 
Red1, you jumped the gun again it seems. So did the person who wrote that the gun most likely was a no check sale at a gun show. It may have been stolen as someone else pointed out and it may have been from a private sale that was not part of a gun show.


Step back and look at the Co shooting. This guy was judged to be a danger to himself and others but the Doc didn't want to stick her neck out and only reported it to the campus cops. She wanted to consult with some of her peers. Then when he quit school the school (real people) decided that it was no longer their business because he was no longer a student. Both of these people should be charged with aiding. If one or the other had done whats right for the general public he would not have been able to buy a gun from any FFL place.

Step back a bit further when someone decided that you just can't take a person and commit them to an intuition because they are a danger to themselves and others. Those people are just a guilty! The last 2 spree shootings both could have been prevented had these 2 shooters been taken off the streets and placed in a facility that could have cared for their needs. I know who is responsible for this, do you?

One country that has very tuff gun laws crime has peaked to the point where they talked about banning kitchen knives! That same country will not add a murder victim to the stats until someone is convicted of that crime because they are afraid that if the true stats came out it would hurt tourism! Main stream American news isn't going to report that. It isn't in the interest of their agenda.

Rick
 
(quoted from post at 17:09:06 12/24/12)
Dec 24, 2012 at 3:10 pm

The Webster, New York man who fired on firefighters responding to a blaze, killing two, is a felon convicted of manslaughter, according to local police. Webster Police Chief Gerald Pickering told a press conference this morning that the suspect was William Spengler, who served roughly 18 years on manslaughter charges for killing his 92 year old grandmother. Spengler had a number of run-ins with the police after that, according to Pickering.

[color=red:2969667cdf]Because Spengler was convicted a felon, he was supposed to be legally barred from owning a gun. However, because of the so-called “gun show loophole” — a National Rifle Assocation (NRA) supported-policy that allows “private” gun sales to take place without background checks — it’s possible Spengler could have purchased his weapon without the seller even checking whether he could legally own a gun or had a history of violence. Guns bought in this manner are used in 80 percent of violent firearm crimes across the country. Moreover, it’s very easy, as a consequence of another set of NRA-supported changes to federal law, for some felons to get their right to own guns reinstated.[/color:2969667cdf]

When asked about the nature of Spengler’s murderous assault on the firefighters, Pickering said that, from what they could tell so far, “it was a trap.”
/quote]

Ahhhhhhhhh, another writer (they're not journalists anymore as far as I'm concerned) throwing conjecture and possibly personal opinion into a story instead of just reporting the facts. :shock: :x
 
First..none of you have really answered the question.

Lets be a bit hypothetical. You are known in he county as an eccentric, multiple gun owner, with strong anti governemt feelings. Your house catches on fire and your 3 kids and aged mother are inside.

The fire fighters are fearful and people die in the fire as firefighters (volunteers) hesitate.

Oldtanker says we have a right to lock you up 'cause you are crazy (and take away all your freedoms) ..but you say you have a right to your guns freedoms ..second Amd.

Hummmm. Government does not have the right to stop you from buying guns but does have the right to lock you away forever?

An interesting bit of logic.
 
(quoted from post at 20:44:16 12/24/12) First..none of you have really answered the question.

Lets be a bit hypothetical. You are known in he county as an eccentric, multiple gun owner, with strong anti governemt feelings. Your house catches on fire and your 3 kids and aged mother are inside.

The fire fighters are fearful and people die in the fire as firefighters (volunteers) hesitate.

Oldtanker says we have a right to lock you up 'cause you are crazy (and take away all your freedoms) ..but you say you have a right to your guns freedoms ..second Amd.

Hummmm. Government does not have the right to stop you from buying guns but does have the right to lock you away forever?

An interesting bit of logic.

Are you saying that fire fighters, pro and volunteers alike are cowards? That now they will have to have an armed escort to carry out their duties? That's pretty insulting. Red1's question is pretty insulting to men and women who risk life and limb to help others. All in the name of pushing his agenda over an isolated incident. He has the right to think that way and to ask that question. I have the right to ignore the basic question. Got a problem with that?

Whats logical about leaving someone who has all the warning signs that he may cause havoc in a community free?

I have the right to be free from fear of harm.

I have the right to send my children to school knowing that they will be free from harm.

I have the right to go to a movie or attend a college class at VA Tech or a plotical event in AZ knowing that I am going to be free from harm.

We can lock up a murderer. We can lock up someone who tries jumping off a building. But we can't lock up someone who professionals deem to be a threat to "other"? That isn't logical in my mind. I don't think we should lock someone up because the guy next door thinks they are over the edge. That needs to be addressed by someone trained to make that assessment.

I have a carry permit. I don't carry often. Where I live I don't feel the need. I have that permit because it makes a political statement. Kind of like the guy who buys an electric car. Just making a statement. I don't own an assault gun. I don't want to be told I can't.

Had someone done that they should have in Co the movie would have been a fun event for the people there. If the laws had been different in VA a bunch of people would have had a future. If the laws had been different in CN and a young man had been in a rubber room a bunch of 6 year old kids would be waking in a few hours to a wonderful morning and that young man may have had a future.

Rick
 
(quoted from post at 20:44:16 12/24/12) First..none of you have really answered the question.

Lets be a bit hypothetical. You are known in he county as an eccentric, multiple gun owner, with strong anti governemt feelings. Your house catches on fire and your 3 kids and aged mother are inside.

The fire fighters are fearful and people die in the fire as firefighters (volunteers) hesitate.

Oldtanker says we have a right to lock you up 'cause you are crazy (and take away all your freedoms) ..but you say you have a right to your guns freedoms ..second Amd.

Hummmm. Government does not have the right to stop you from buying guns but does have the right to lock you away forever?

An interesting bit of logic.

Forgot to add.....

Firearms had nothing to do with a famous event. A sick person used legally obtained things to make a bomb that he set off by a building in Ok. Remember that? Can't walk into a store and buy explosives. You have to have a license to buy explosives. Didn't seem to stop that guy. But I have the right to visit a federal building or to place a child in daycare knowing I and they will be free from harm.

Now please tell me about the rights of a person who because of mental issues has the right to be free when they can do harm to others.


Opps, me, I, who spent my youth and my health, insuring your right to pose questions like you did don't think much of the rights of someone who is in need of help and without that help and maybe being remanded to an instution may cause great harm to others.

Rick
 
The guy had beat his grandmother to death and only served 17 years these murders are more the fault of the people that let him out of the cage to start with he'd should have died in that cage or better yet executed.Also a convicted felon so he shouldn't have had a gun to start with.So would stopping law abiding citizens from owning guns of stopped this guy? If I'm next door to him or a nut like him I need a gun more than anyone for protection.
 
Gee I thought the constitution gave me the right to my own, even differing, opinion.

Sorry I interupted your convoluted rant.
 
(quoted from post at 07:45:36 12/25/12) Gee I thought the constitution gave me the right to my own, even differing, opinion.

Sorry I interupted your convoluted rant.

Edd, by all means you have that right just as I have the right rights to say what I did.

You, in a convoluted way went after what I said. So I guess we are in the same boat there.

Fresh news this morning on this crime has this guys sister missing too. Then goes on about another guy from that area who last year set his parents home on fire killing his father and brother. His weapon of choice, gas.

I still think that you and Red1 both are calling into question the courage of fire fighters, perhaps their intelligence too.


Rick
 

We sell tractor parts! We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today.

Back
Top