Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver
 
Marketplace
Classified Ads
Photo Ads
Tractor Parts
Salvage

Community
Discussion Forums
Project Journals
Your Stories
Events Calendar
Hauling Schedule

Galleries
Tractor Photos
Implement Photos
Vintage Photos
Help Identify
Parts & Pieces
Stuck & Troubled
Vintage Ads
Community Album
Photo Ad Archives

Research & Info
Articles
Tractor Registry
Tip of the Day
Safety Cartoons
Tractor Values
Serial Numbers
Tune-Up Guide
Paint Codes
List Prices
Production Nbrs
Tune-Up Specs
Torque Values
3-Point Specs
Glossary

Miscellaneous
Tractor Games
Just For Kids
Virtual Show
Museum Guide
Memorial Page
Feedback Form

Yesterday's Tractors Facebook Page

  
Tractor Talk Discussion Board

Re: Still haven't figured it out.....


[ Expand ] [ View Replies ] [ Add a Reply ] [ Return to Forum ]

Posted by jackinok on July 18, 2012 at 08:19:52 from (162.58.82.135):

In Reply to: Still haven't figured it out..... posted by NCWayne on July 17, 2012 at 20:33:30:

its being done in places as you say. oklahoma city gets water through under ground tunnels from miles and miles away. But (theres always one for some reason) the problem as i see it is that most of the water for the major river systems here comes from the midwest.Lakes here fill first,then it goes downstream.not the other way around.When we have too much,so do they.Barges on the mississippi for instance are being severly curtailed by the current drought up stream,and that carries a major percentage of our goods in the us. If you were to pump even more back upstream to be held it obviously would be even lower. The problem is not getting water,as you say it can be pumped or directed for miles.But the main problem as i see it is holding it till needed.IF it were pumped directly into an auquifer as you suggest,every drop would have to be treated somehow or you would risk polluting an entire auquifer that may stretch across several states making that area virtualy unihabitable.More to it than simply moving water from point a to point b in my opinion. Besides the initial cost of building the system there would be huge maintenance costs,and lets face it, our roads and bridges are falling apart now.A better solution in my opinion would be desalination plants along the coasts,and the redirecting of water that normaly goes there back to the midwest.Infrastructure would be shorter and less costly,maintenance costs should be less,etc. note: most of the southwest portion of the US was considered uninhabitable until early in the 1900's even the spanish settlements didnt extend much north of santa fe.The reason was water. as late as 1868 a military patrol in the region to the north and east of amarillo texas survived only by drinking the blood of their horses. even the buffalo and indians would desert the area for years. the simple fact remains after all this time that it still is a dry country at heart.learning to adapt to IT,instead of adapting it to OUR needs and wishes is the answer,not trying to make it something it isnt. the whole high plains region is in fact normaly dry.we can irrigate it at great costs,of course but that is quickly becoming unsustainable. as the current dry spell points out. we have proved for years we can make the desert bloom.but at what cost? heres a little fact for you,100% of the water on earth is still on earth,it never goes away. the problem is ,is it still usable?is it suited to the task and limitations we want to use it for? thats the rub ,we pollute it then we have to treat it.its a never ending cycle.the biggest problem now is we are polluting it faster than nature can recycle it.Could we do as you say? yes it could be done but the costs would far exceed all of the combined benefits put together.maybe we could flood and hold water in the whole great salt lake basin,every drop of that water never reaches the ocean now.and it would hold theoreticaly enough water. but we would lose several major cities,a major portion of the ground we were trying to use,and displace no telling how many people who would then be relying on already strained rescources in other areas. bottom line is its sort of a catch 22 deal.


Replies:




Add a Reply

:
:
:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Advanced Posting Options

: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.



 
Advanced Posting Tools
  Upload Photo  Select Gallery Photo  Attach Serial # List 
Return to Post 

TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Today's Featured Article - The 8N and the Fox - by Zane Sherman. Dec. 13 1998, Renfroe, Alabama. Last niht I dreamed about the day that I plowed the field of about 10 acres over on what Jimmy and Dandy called the Ledbetter field. I was driving the 1948 8N Ford tractor that Jimmy bought in 48 new This was prebably in about 1951 and maybe even befor the house was built. This would have made me to be about16 years old and I drove the tractor for nothing and would have paid to drive it if I had had any money which I didn't, but neit ... [Read Article]

Latest Ad: Sell 1958 Hi-Altitude Massey Fergerson tractor, original condition. three point hitch pto engine, Runs well, photos available upon request [More Ads]

Copyright © 1997-2024 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy