Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Farmall & IHC Tractors Discussion Forum
:

Your thoughts on a 574

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
PUTTER

03-16-2006 07:18:20




Report to Moderator

Hello All. Just seen an add in the local add sheet for a 574. Comes with new front tires, loader, new tire chains and 6foot brush hog. 1900 original hours. I've been wanting to upgrade from my 340 Farmall, think the loader would come in handy, and the added horsepower would be a plus for the field work I do. Haven't been around utility tractors much. Do you guys think it would be a good upgrade if I can get it by the war dept. Thanks PUTTER

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
PUTTER

03-17-2006 10:00:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to PUTTER, 03-16-2006 07:18:20  
Hey guys, Sorry for getting back to yah so late. Thanks for all the good advice. Here's the story, the adress was in the paper so I drove by to take a look. Nobody home. I looked it over ,gas model in nice original condition. Says in the paper he wants 7200 which I think is to steep but what the heck i'll make him an offer. Called the guy, SOLD. Story of my life. I don't think the boss would let me spend that kind of money on a tractor i would be lucky to put 40 hours a year on. Thank you all very much for the info. PUTTER

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
DJL

03-16-2006 20:34:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to PUTTER, 03-16-2006 07:18:20  
Putter,
Dad bought an IH 574 diesel utility with horizontal exhaust new in 1979. It had the 2250 mount-o-matic loader on it too. We ran that tractor for everything, loader work, haying, even pulled a 6 row planter with it for awhile. It was overworked and hate to admit it but probably a little under maintained. It's got more than enough power, good on fuel, was extremely reliable and will get around in some tight places. The only thing we ever did was a water pump and one clutch. We ran that thing to about 5800 hours. About a year and a half ago it was showing that we didn't have much oil pressure when the motor got hot and was developing a small leak in the radiator. Dad traded it for a brand new JD 5320 and quick tach loader. I think he got $6800 on trade. That tractor didn't owe us a dime for all the work it did! Dad really likes the new Deere, and it pains me to say this (as I like the green stuff too) but he still complains that the 574 was smoother running and quieter. Make sure you weight up the back end for loader work, or it won't do too much, for lack of traction. Let me know how it turns out, as I've got a soft spot in my heart for those old 574's.
DJL

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
DADDY E

03-16-2006 19:59:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to PUTTER, 03-16-2006 07:18:20  
I have had a 574 utility diesel with the 2250 quick-attach loader for 16yrs. It now has 4200hrs & has been a very versital tractor.18.5-30 tires. I overhauled the front axle (all new bushings & bearings), made it steer like new again. Changed all the fluids & filters when I got it(Trans. oil was lite brown; probably water or condisation). It's a well built tractor and I would go for it, you won't be disappointed. E from ont.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
DADDY E

03-16-2006 19:57:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to PUTTER, 03-16-2006 07:18:20  
I have had a 574 utility diesel with the 2250 quick-attach loader for 16yrs. It now has 4200hrs & has been a very versital tractor.18.5-30 tires. I overhauled the front axle (all new bushings & bearings), made it steer like new again. Changed all the fluids & filters when I got it(Trans. oil was lite brown; probably water or condisation). It's a well built tractor and I would go for it, you won't be disappointed. E from ont.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
DADDY E

03-16-2006 19:47:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to PUTTER, 03-16-2006 07:18:20  
I have had a 574 utility diesel with the 2250 quick-attach loader for 16yrs. It now has 4200hrs & has been a very versital tractor.18.5-30 tires. I overhauled the front axle (all new bushings & bearings), made it steer like new again. Changed all the fluids & filters when I got it(Trans. oil was lite brown; probably water or condisation). It's a well built tractor and I would go for it, you won't be disappointed. E from ont.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
wolfman

03-16-2006 17:21:28




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to PUTTER, 03-16-2006 07:18:20  
I have a Row Crop Diesel with vertical exhaust. Bought it to "pretty up" and re-sell. Ran it a few days & decided to keep it. Handy tractor. Geared nice, turns very short; with 16.9-30's it plays with 3 14's in our tough soil. Drove a gas utility with the swep back axle & 14.9-28's. It seemed much smaller, but it, too, handled nicely.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
wolfman

03-16-2006 17:26:56




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to wolfman, 03-16-2006 17:21:28  
The diesel is very peppy. A lot more hp than a 340. 52 honest hp vs 34 or so. Had a 574 Diesel a few years ago that someone must have turned up the pump to make it a 674. It would set you back in the seat! Sorry that I sold it.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Retcol

03-16-2006 13:02:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to PUTTER, 03-16-2006 07:18:20  
You didn't mention if it is an utility or row crop tractor. The row crop had adjustable rear axles. The row crop tractor had the muffler sticking out of the top of the hood. I owned a row crop for many years. We used it to bale hay but my wife complained that her legs would get hot from straddling the transmission. I like the syncromesh transmission and it was great loader tractor. When I first got it I had to have fuel tank purged because there was so much dirt in it.In the winter the gas line tends to freeze.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
chadd

03-16-2006 12:27:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to PUTTER, 03-16-2006 07:18:20  
574's are great loader, utility, and small chore tractors. Very maneuverable and agile, they can pretty much fit in anywhere. They are also very well built and reliable. I wouldn't recommend them for heavy tillage though. Main trouble points have already been mentioned, but here are a few more:
1. make sure the park brake is either disconnected or properly adjusted, otherwise it will burn up the brake and the chunks will fall into the transmission oil, plugging up the filters.
2. Check the condition of the gas tank. If the tank is rusty, get ready for a lot of trouble with stalling. It uses a complicated tank design with crossover tubes that are known for plugging up, leaving you with only half of the tanks capacity being usable(side opposite the filler). Best way to clean it is to disconnect the lines and blow out with compressed air.
3. See if the differential lock still works. It is the pedal to the right of the transmission tube between your legs and right in front of the seat. The pedal can rust tight, and if loosened back up , the lock will work just fine. If you plan to do any pulling with the loader attached, you will need this pedal, or you will be getting another tractor to pull it out. 4. If it is gas and you experience hard starting, missing, and low power, try disconnecting the fuel line between the tank and the carb, and blow compressed air through it. You wouldn't believe the crud that can come out. Clean the carb screen while you are at it.

Although the power rating is quite a bit higher than your 340, it really won't show. It is all high rpm power, and will probably feel only slightly more powerful than your 340. Our 36 horspower W6 feels a LOT more powerful than our 574. Also, if it is gas, it seems to use quite a bit more fuel per hour than the older gas tractors. If you are going to be working it really hard, prepare for hot legs and feet. The underslung exhaust really heats things up! (on a sidenote, don't put anything in the toolbox under your left foot with the underslung exhaust, it will melt the rubber off of a rubber coated wrench handle and scald you when you try to remove it. Don't ask me how I found out:) I would recommend them for loader work. Really great for loading trucks.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
P Backus

03-16-2006 08:45:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to PUTTER, 03-16-2006 07:18:20  
I have spent some time on a 574 gas as well as a 504 or 544 Hydro. Of all the red tractors I"ve driven, these are not my favorites. In some ways the 574 is nice. As noted before, it has P.S., good brakes, nice power for the size, etc., but it is clutzy in some ways. The hydraulic levers are in a goofy place, and the governor seemed sluggish. I"m not a fan of the unerneath exhaust, either. I"m sure others will disagree with me, but it just wasn"t my favorite tractor- not as handy as I would have liked. Still, it"s well made and reliable.
Don"t get me started on the 504!
Paul

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Quebec Red

03-16-2006 07:39:46




Report to Moderator
 Re: Your thoughts on a 574 in reply to PUTTER, 03-16-2006 07:18:20  
You did not say if the motor is gas or diesel. If gas, it is a 200 inch. Have no experience on those as all 544s or 5-674s sold here were diesel. We will let some other more knowledgeable poster talk about the 200 inchers. The diesel is a 239 German. Could have Rossa or Bouesh (sp) pump. The Rossa is cheaper to repair but not as performing. The 574 has many modern tractor features as hyd brakes, hyd PTO, hydrostatic PS, syn or HYDRO trans, etc. Be certain that the parking brake will drag the wheels, proper repairs are $$$. The std. trans, 8x4 is virtually bullit proof. The optional TA is just that - TA. If you rebuild the TA add an extra clutch disc (experience). If HYDRO, check pressures by the book, and use only HY-TRAN oil. Generally a good tractor, put 7000 hours plus on one. A rad filter would be a good investment to prevent cativtation of the sleeves..... ..QR..

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy