Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

No more Winchester guns?

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
jdemaris

03-18-2006 05:49:53




Report to Moderator

I don't consider this off-topic. I've shot many a deer with my Winchester Model 70, and dragged them home with my Deere tractor. I've always had high-regard for the older pre-1964 Winchester guns - although when it comes to lever-actions, I like Marlins better. They shoot well, look nice, and are a piece of history just like some old d*mn tractor. I just heard a little news-blurb on the radio - it was casually mentioned like it was "no big deal." They said Winchester is closing down - the factory being somewhere in New England - CT or Mass. It was also mentioned that Winchester is owned by a company in Belgium. Last year I heard something similar about Remington - but I think that was just for a specific factory and perhaps not the entire company. A few years further back, the Ithaca gun company folded. Years back, the Ithaca "Deerslayer" was one of the most popular guns in my area. I've read that, at least part of the problem with producing guns is all the law-suits in the United States. Same mentality as cigarettes, SUVs, etc. I guess nobody CHOSES to smoke cigarettes, nobody DRIVES SUVs (mind of their own?), and with guns - I guess they load themselves, and then go around shooting people. I guess I better start watching mine more closely.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
sorry-accountin

03-18-2006 17:24:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: No more Winchester guns? in reply to jdemaris, 03-18-2006 05:49:53  
a lot of this problem (selling off and closing) goes to them mentality of Whats best for the stock holders today is best PERIOD! well that is just not the case but we have let this take over.

Profit now is so much a prize that corps will sell out (just like the Gov of INDIANA) just to get money now. They cant see the LONG term despite what they say... it looks great right now.. thats all that matters.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Billy NY

03-18-2006 10:57:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: No more Winchester guns? in reply to jdemaris, 03-18-2006 05:49:53  
It is sad, I would like to understand the mechanics of these business failures. Times during WW-II every machine shop in this country was busy, big or small, times changes economy changes but one that that does not change is the desire for quality. The lesser quality items are made to look attractive, and the cost savings is there, it's turned us into a disposable society.

The things upper management and executives do today do not give any regard to keeping a long standing company going. You wonder what innovative tactics could be used to combat the things that undermine some of our best manufacturers, a coalition of companies and people that will support them, strategizing on how to steer people away from junk, no matter how you cut it, it's a tall order in today's world. I don't know much about it, but I do detest the junk that is out there, I don't buy it, don't support it and do everything I can to support the good ones left.

I've always carried a pocket knife, but you won't find one made in china in my pocket, Schrade was an all time favorite, once great company suffered a defeat recently, still operating, retained their long standing craftsmen, but with all the junk out there, people don't know or care about Schrade steel alloy and how it holds an edge and the tight fit, compared to the sloppy junk everywhere. One example of this.

Firearms, was an avid shooter, still hunt religiously, some handloading here and there, it is sad to see some of the traditional manufacturers disappear. I've been to the Remington plant in Illion, NY, almost 20 years ago, been to one in Mass, forget the MFR. now, they were both impressive. A few years ago I saved an article about Smith and Wesson, when they folded under the government pressure regrading those new safety features, that and something else made me believe they were a sellout, but I know nothing of the facts, just what I read, so it's unfair to really make a generalization like that, but I hear ya, wish there was something all of us could do to help these remaining business's, we have a proud heritage that is getting undermined badly.

I admire the american made infantry rifles of the past, for what they represent, the engineering, quality, made by proud americans, like the M1 garand and the M-14, I grabbed a Springfield Armory M1-A, it was always a fun shooter, but to some disbelief, I do hunt with it, using my own handloads, kind heavy at 9lbs. but for whitetail it's my version of the standard Winchester '94 .30-.30 or like dads in .32 special, that was a tool for putting food on the table years ago, and although I'm not a fan of the caliber, any good hunter could put it to good use, was inexpensive to purchase and lasted for years with good care. The 70 certainly was another classic, my friend has a model 46 in .218 bee, an odball but a fun shooter to handload, was his dads on there old farm. It's all relevant, farms, tractors and firearms are some of the tools that go with the territory. These are also some of the first things I learned about as youngster, and still highly respect today.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Billy NY

03-18-2006 11:30:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: No more Winchester guns? in reply to Billy NY, 03-18-2006 10:57:54  
Sorry about that, was long enough as it is, no need to see it twice ! Had to run the 100 yd dash to politely inform someone they were tresspassing, forgot where I left off and hit the button again, after I got the error message.

At least I caught the person driving around, can be so annoying since I let the power company build an access road, ( 300 tons of crushed stone for free though ! ) to access their easement, which I have to legally do anyways according to the deed, people think it's a public park now, not good, time for a gate.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

03-18-2006 12:11:44




Report to Moderator
 Power Company foreign owned also in reply to Billy NY, 03-18-2006 11:30:49  
Now I'm really veering off the path of "old tractors", but I could rant and rave for hours about what I've gone through with the power company. I gave them permission to build a "one time" use access road through my property for a major high-line upgrade. They did just about nothing that they promised - but they did manage to cut off a tractor road between two fields (there - I managed to fit a tractor into this). One day I found a huge all-terrain vehicle with a crane on it, laying upside down at the side of one of my fields. It had a company name on it from Québec, Canada - not Niagara Mohawk (the power company). I called the power company - and they told me I should chase down the Canadian company - and not the power company. And, like a d*mn fool, I replied "but YOU are the people I gave permission too . . ." I got nowhere, and finally chained the machine to one of my tractors, and then chained the access road. The power company called - first the State Police, and then brought in their own security team. The police admitted to me that they could do nothing since it's my property, i.e. a "civil matter." Then the power company security people came, claimed they'd cut the lock off the chains - and I said "go ahead and this time - I'll call the state police." By the time we got done, I made them pay me $1000 damage - in cash - no checks - and then let them out. The process took three days. The money actually was handed to me by a representitive of the Canadian company that was working for the power company. Since then, I've been cursed with four-wheelers, hunters, snowmobilers, etc. breaking into the gate. Even found some old drunk with a four-wheel drive truck in there one night - he had half landed in my swamp and got stuck, also had a half-naked young girl with him. Had I been smart, I'd brought my dozer up and pushed him the rest of way into the swamp. He told me that he thought my fields on top of the mountain were "town roads." And - about the subject of selling off United States names and interests . . . my power company - the former Niagra Mohawk and now called National Grid - is godd*m British owned ! It's the American Revolution in reverse! It's bad enough with all our manufacturing going to China - but now I'm finding French-Canadians in my backyard - screwing up my fields and roads - and sent there by the British Redcoats.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Billy NY

03-19-2006 06:44:34




Report to Moderator
 Re: Power Company foreign owned also in reply to jdemaris, 03-18-2006 12:11:44  
JD, you sure sound fired up about that one, but I suppose it can be tough to deal with these people if you let them get the upper hand. Your location appears to have enough traffic to be more than annoying.

It's a very relevant topic with all the "right of way's" and "easements" crossing farmland out there, it's something a lot of people deal with, now all we have to do is get on our tractors armed with our Winchesters and take on the Redcoats ! LOL.

Maybe it's just me, but it sounds like a communication problem that happened at your place. I'm not sure what your arrangement is on the property, but you would not expect to see another company's equipment out there, but once they start, you don't know who will show up. In construction every subcontractor must be included in a hold harmless or the owner indemnified, keeping the owner from liability from a general contractor and any various subs, obviously like here they needed to gain access to their property, do they own it outright at your place ?

Anytime someone comes onto anothers property, it does feel like you're invaded, especially after years and years of tranquility. People try to use our 98 acres as a pass through, more so lately. I have maintained an active presence to let them know it's not appreciated and will not be tolerated, stating no one asked for permission, and until someone does, kindly stay off, can't say how much longer I'll be able to enjoy it, it's a tax burden, so I want what is left, without distraction. I don't like doing it, I'll say that just about everyone that I have stopped was polite, and has always understood, apologized etc., so I try not to be a jerk, but once in awhile one of them will get an earful, it does get annoying, it's a distraction. I hate posted signs, people go right past them anyways, 2 weeks ago, a young school teacher riding an ATV drove right into my back yard, I cursed him out, and told him to get the F out, I don't like people that close to the house, as the urban environment and the associated crime is getting closer to us, our place is in a nice location for this, it's not far from city limits, I've always liked it though, not too far out in the rural area, but just enough distance and space to still enjoy a place with a few acres. Same school teacher came back last week, I popped out of the woods and jumped in front of the ATV unexpectedly, I said "hey aren't you the same guy I tossed out last week ?" Ok, I said listen, you were a little close to the house, ( unbeknownst to most neighbors, I used to work away in NYC so, I want people to know the place is watched in case I ever go back). So I had a conversation with the guy and he was very apologetic about tresspassing. It ended on a polite note and although I owe these people nothing, I hate being a jerk to them or anyone if at all possible, but still don't take any crap from anyone either, you will respect the place, or you buy it and pay the taxes yourself. They make us out to be the bad guys when we tell them to leave. However, I did catch him redhanded bypassing the signs that are clearly visible, people are just oblivious to signs, they mean nothing anymore, so that fuels my fire, it simply means the owner does not want or does not allow strangers on the property, you have to ask for permission.

Niagara Mohawk being bought by National Grid, I think it sucks. I've known a lot of people who worked for them, we used to buy there old equipment and re-sell it our Ford Dealership on the side, like people who buy former fleet vehicles today for re-sale. I know Nimo used to have the union stigma about it, but it was a good outfit to work for, not to say any of us like the power companies, and their "fees" the re-organization has made the internal structure worse, they were not losing money, no need for it, if we are to pay the premium, we might as well have the premium services performed by some of the people I've known, from engineers to linemen, and yeah I've seen them playing botchy (spelling?) ball on the job, during downtime, but none of the linemen I knew were slouches, when lines were down, they worked, and even on most jobs I've seen they worked hard, I had a lot of confidence in the people that worked for Nimo. Not anymore, they're in upheaval, outsourcing the work, subcontractors mostly, no more big core of in-house trades. It's not the same.

When the right away agent approached me about the tower they are doing to build, ( they have to span our 23 acre pond and replace an existing span ) I asked to see the design drawings and had him bring a copy of the deeds stating the requirements of having to allow them access to their easement, we own on either side, they are landlocked. We went over the details, of the job, the tower is going up in a field that uses there property, so a lot of the field is being taken up now, but most of it will be restored we had use of all of it for 40 years. We went over the details of the job, I almost went after and bid the excavation and concrete for the towers, hey why not, I could walk to work LOL. When they came to build the road, I worked with the operators to "sight in" the road, I cut down a few nice mature sumacs and left an island of them on one side for aesthetic reasons, it looked nice and it's what I wanted left. The dozer operator did a lot of extra work for me, as the right of way agent told the crew to take care of the owner here, they also graded off our lot and placed 120 tons of crushed stone down, besides the other 200 or so for the road, all of which they would take up and stockpile if I wanted the road removed. It worked a lot better with these guys when I worked with them, they respected the place and when said in done, I got a lot of work done and materials for free. They left a JD 650 lgp rental dozer on the lot, I got a few days use of that when they were done for the cost of fuel which was not much. The operators were very good people, we worked together, he sure was generous with that stone. It kind of attracted some people/tresspassers to the property, but it's under control, have to keep them in check. When they cleared the entire easement, the deluge of atv's became a problem, but the right of way agent has been and will be assisting in mitigating the problem, the traffic uses their property illegally to gain access to our one nice bottom field, and that I don't like, they have destroyed crops in the field before and run through my clover patch.

I'd better cut myself off here !

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

03-19-2006 07:59:09




Report to Moderator
 Propery rights, emminent domain, adverse use, etc. in reply to Billy NY, 03-19-2006 06:44:34  
With the power company, there was no communication problem from my end. I've got fifty acres up on a steep moutain top and the power company owns a fifty-foot width of property cutting through it. Their high-lines ran through it in the center of the fifty feet. Their land runs to a town-highway, but it's real steep. When the lines were first put in, in the 40s, that managed to do it all using their own land for getting in and out - and probably did the work in the summer. Now, they wanted EASY access and wanted to do the work in the winter - which is nuts! Also, they didn't want to put the new highlines back in the middle of their own land - because they'd have to remove the old ones first to do that. So, they decided it would be easier to put all the new poles and lines on my land, get it all ready to energize, and then do the change-over in one day. Once done, they would tear the old stuff down, their original 50 foot width of land would be unused, and they'd now be using my land - forever. Communication on their part was poor mainly because they don't do any of their own work. The hired Asplundh to take down trees and build roads, the French-Canadian outfit to put in the new highlines, and even hired a separate company to negotiate new right-of-ways. Seems nobody knew what was going on outside the scope of their own particular job and it was a mess. With the road-building - I walked the property with their "engineers", marked trees, and made my self available. They were supposed to notify me when road-work started, and I would re-walk the site and advise whoever was actually doing the work. Never happened. They showed up, cut in a new road, never called or asked me, and missed by a couple of hundred feet in certain areas. They then put a locked gate on the access with their own keys (didn't give me keys to access my own property). So - as I said before - I cut off their lock, put on my own, and chained some of their equipment to my tractor (that was on my land, not their's). They tried to bully me, it did not work. The reality is - the individual contractors wanted to be helpful - but they only knew what they were told by the power company. I confronted the French Canadian guys when I found their machine upside down along the side of my field - with over twenty trees knocked down where it came it. The one guy I found that spoke english told me he didn't even know it was private property - he said the power company told him they owned it. THAT IS when I threw them out and chained up their equipment. They are gone now (until next time), I got paid some money for damages, but they never corrected the road. I've got another 100 acres with power company right-of-ways zig-zagging all over it - and they're going to have a battle next time they come to work on any of it for any reason. On the subject of owning property, sometimes I think it's not worth it. I've had my own sugar-woods, firewood and woodlots for years - but with what I pay in taxes now - I could go out and buy my firewood and maple syrup a lot cheaper than what I pay in taxes. And the good log lots with timber value get taxed very high. The town I live in tried to take some of my property last year by emminent domain - but so far I've held them off. Sad thing is - with the "quick take" means of emminent domain, they can do it anytime as long as nobody shows up at a public meeting to vote it down. And, there is no legal recourse if it is proved what they did is wrong! Right now, the law states - if your land is taken by emminent domain, and you prove later the taking was wrong and NOT justified, you can NOT get your property back - just some additional compensation if you're lucky. Now, another related experience. I own a large tract of wetland and forest land up north (Jefferson County, Tug Hill, NY). It has been our own - what we regard as - private wildlife refuge. Very remote, frogs, beaver, deer, ducks, etc. all over the place. Ten years ago this was the most remote place in New York State - and it also gets the most snowfall in the contiguous 48 states because of lake-effect snow from Lake Ontario. It's a four-hour drive so I only get up there once or twice a year. In the past few years, a logger cut a road right through the middle of our property in order to log someone else's lot. We had to get the state police involved. Now, with the road in place, people are treating it like a public highway and trying to get the town to maintain it. And, snowmobiles and ATVs are using it. It's NUTS! We've been sending out "permission letters" to all the tresspassers we know of. We are giving permission so no one can claim "adverse use" and get a judge to grant them permanent access. Our only other option is to gate it - but since we are not there to watch it - it's likely the gate will be torn down as soon as we leave. I already tried replanting trees in the new road - and they were all gone the next time we went there. So what is the answer? Give up, sell all this sh*t, and get an apartment somewhere? People need to wake up, and realize - they must stand up for other people when they see their property rights being trashed - or their own land will be next. When I went to a town meeting trying to stop the emminent domain where I live - a neighbor spoke up. I don't know this guy, he's a newly arrived city person who lives 2 miles from me - but he is my closest "neighbor." He said, publically, " I don't give a damn what you do to this other guy (meaning me), but you're not gonna' take my land." THAT is the mentality that will lead to everyone losing their rights.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Billy NY

03-19-2006 12:02:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Propery rights, emminent domain, adverse use, in reply to jdemaris, 03-19-2006 07:59:09  
That is bizarre, I made sure to keep them in check here as best I could and work with them, however had they gone over the line, they would have been stopped, not allowed to return on any portion of our side of both property lines. They tried to purchase more width, years ago, some people sold, we did not.

The operators said they might want to start the tower construction in mid winter, and said that that having a hint of that, they were sparing no expense on the road they need to bring in the crane and the tower sections, apparently they know how the bosses like to work and try and get ahead of the game, like all agency type scenarios, they sometimes do a lot of things that don't make sense, they already have the tower sections fabricated, but did not have a foundation design, they did borings last August, to determine the soil bearing capacity and so on.

They did survey their 175'-200'wide easement established a center line. The first time Asplundh went through and cleared the brush and trees off, and appear to stay within their easement. 2nd time they came through they did some heavy clearing on the opposite side, engineers decided to switch sides for the new circuit to be added. We already have 1 wooden set and high tension on steel, forget the capacity, but to increase the existing they would have to do a lot of work, as the big line is at capacity now, it's big dollars if it goes off line. They have to cross our pond/wetland, the existing wooden set is leaning, it will share the new tower at this juncture to make the crossing. Best thing you can do is get your point across to the right of way agent ahead of any planned work, not sure if the same guy handles your area or not.

We've had similar issues and opinions regarding property rights, the state erected a sign ( I could post a photo if knew how on this site ) denoting an area they built along the state 2 lane highway east-west NY Rt. 7 when they put in sheet piling, took some of our under property eminent domain. Sign says our towns name then Viewing Area, small parking area was built so they have exploited our wetland for public viewing. I don't mind people enjoying what I see from my home for the last 30 years, the most productive wetland in the county, but it's the way they went about it. They are proposing a new super walmarts within 150' of the water line, we already have a walmart, as I type there is NYS police helicopter searching for someone out there, rattling my house, I'm wondering what kind of criminal is out there now. No peace and quiet on a sunday.

There is a photo of part of our wetland on the 1st page of the link I posted, from the public viewing area. All of the propsed changes to our town are posted on this site, it's unreal, you do wonder about continuing to own land, soon as a road is cut in the atv's take over, Tug Hill, boy that must be fun to keep people off, that's where all the snowmobilers head to, especially when there is no snow.

The NYS police does not like to deal ATV and tresspassing issues, the local barracks gets 10-12 calls a day about it, and it's just a violation, they issue you a court appearance ticket, so tresspassers have it made, it's a joke in one sense.

Taxes, like you said, for what you pay, there seems to be something wrong. Oh well, good discussion though.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Don L C

03-18-2006 08:41:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: No more Winchester guns? in reply to jdemaris, 03-18-2006 05:49:53  
Yes Winchester was bought out in 1960 or there abuots....I am a gun smith and have this information in my books.....the quality of the gun went down....to bad they made a fine lever action....I don't know about Remington, they have been on shacky ground for the last 80 -- 90 years....even Colt has had some bad times...
.
These co. depended on contracts from world goverments....

The way big companies to-day work, the CEOs sell of parts of the co. , fill there pockets and let the co. go belly up.....

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
old_bc

03-18-2006 08:31:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: No more Winchester guns? in reply to jdemaris, 03-18-2006 05:49:53  
I read an article that stated that Olin owned the Winchester brand name and closing the plant violated the agreement. According to the article the Belgian company could only use the Winchester name for 1 more year.
old_bc



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
NC Wayne

03-18-2006 07:59:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: No more Winchester guns? in reply to jdemaris, 03-18-2006 05:49:53  
"Effective March 31,2006 the New Haven mfg facility will close and stop manufacturing the Model 70, 90, and 1300". What your hearing, basically, according to an article in the American Hunter magazine, is this. The US Repeating Arms Company (USRAC), one of the companys that produces Winchester rifles, is owned by Belgin based FN Herstal which also produces both Winchester and Browning firearms. Sales and therefore production from the New Haven facility has dropped by nearly 2/3 in the past three years due to cheap overseas competition. So they've decided to close the plant to save money. USARC was licesened through Olin Corp, the former owner of Winchester to produce these Winchester firearms through 2007. Problem is when they close the New haven facility the three models listed can't be produced anywhere else because of an existing union contract valid through til 2008. After the expiration of that contract production doesn't seem likely either. According to company reps their concentrating more on new products instead of the older ones. In the end it's not "Winchester" as a brand going away, it's just three of their oldest and most popular models. As a brand their still owned by FN Herstal and other models will still be produced in Portugal, Belgium, and Japan. Basically it's just another case of America selling out to cheap overseas labor..... ..... This info came from the American Hunter Magazine available theough the NRA. If your not already a member please take the time to sign up and help protect our rights to own any firearm, no matter where their made. Just my .02

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JK-NY

03-18-2006 07:00:51




Report to Moderator
 Re: No more Winchester guns? in reply to jdemaris, 03-18-2006 05:49:53  
There is a small aticle in the Syracuse NY Fri. paper that mentions that the Winchester(US Repeating Arms Co) plant will close at the end of the month after an unsuccessfull 2 month search for a buyer for the company.After the Itaca Gun works closed the company was reformed and operated in a much smaller scale in King Ferry NYin the old school building.The operation then moved to Auburn a couple years ago and has recently gone out of business again.I remember seeing new Ithaca Shotguns advertised in the fall of 2004. I agree with you guys ,it is a great loss, partially caused by lawsuits and anti-gun sentiment popular today. Personally I think another reason is that Hunting and shooting sports are not popular with younger people anymore so that cuts the demand for new guns, especially rifles and shotguns way down, except for newer developments that arent as plentiful used , such as in-line muzzleloaders.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Coloken

03-18-2006 06:52:58




Report to Moderator
 happened years ago in reply to jdemaris, 03-18-2006 05:49:53  
Yes, it is a shame, but you guys are about 20 or 30 years late. Winchester, as the real winchester, shut down/went bankrupt about 20 or 30 years ago. The name has been sold and used by several companies since. May happen again.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

03-18-2006 08:01:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: happened years ago in reply to Coloken, 03-18-2006 06:52:58  
Well yeah, you're technically correct. Some will argue that it was all over for Winchester after 1964. But, I kind of hate to see the name die, regardless of who is actually the owner. They were still making guns with design and actions that were at least close to traditional Winchester. The "name buying" thing gets pretty confusing. I've got an "Indian" motorcycle that was built in the 50s in India - but the name was owned by a British gun and bike maker - Royal Enield - and they bought the "Indian" name and logo from the original American motorcycle company. Now, I see these 50s bikes for sale, brand new - some labeled "Indian" and some "Indian Enfield." And, added to all this, I guess theres another company making V-twin Indians now in the US. I just bought a new Mossberg 30.06 rifle and I'm not sure who made it. It lists an address, in small print, in Texas with a name other than Mossberg. What a mess.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Coloken

03-18-2006 10:10:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: happened years ago in reply to jdemaris, 03-18-2006 08:01:17  
Next step will probable be a traviling tool truck selling winchester rifles that are made in China.
All most every good name has been sold into prostitution.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
RB/CT

03-18-2006 06:02:02




Report to Moderator
 Re: No more Winchester guns? in reply to jdemaris, 03-18-2006 05:49:53  
I agree, what a shame. I started my hunting with a Winchester Model 67a youth rifle, (still have it, along with a spare) that I bought for $15.00. Winchester, of which my uncle worked as a tool and die maker, was a great company in New Haven Ct. They are closing and the last 180 workers left are out the door. They are fighting for severance pay, as they see no future. The mayor of New Haven john DeStefano fought to have guns banned with the lawsuits, but when Winchester announced that it was closing, he tried to stick up for it and keep it. A real tradegy that the firm is leaving, I believe the high cost of taxes and running a business in CT was the cause. I will always treasure my two Winchester Model 67a's and they will be passed down. (One of the few guns Winchester made with no serial numbers, thats how popular they were) Thanks for your concern. again a real American manufacturing tragedy.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy