Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Tractor Talk Discussion Forum

OT UAW

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Dennis (VA)

05-04-2009 07:27:48




Report to Moderator

Please explain how UAW doomed Detroit.

a. did they design the cars no one wanted? No
b. did they dictate labor terms?. No they negotiated them with management who approved.
c. did they force GM to give FIAT $2B to get out of an agreement for GM to buy them
d. did they invest billions in Saturn and then let the company wither without new products
e. Did they pay management hundreds of millions as the company made an ever downward spiral? No
f. Did the UAW tilt the output to all the gas guzzlers No
h. Did the UAW design the hardware that wouldn't last and broke all the time. etc.

Tell me how they did it. We made good cars in the '50-'60's with the UAW.

I think you guys listen to much to FOX guys who are really spouting this crap to drive down every working mans wages, so they, the top 1 persent can get an even bigger share of the economy. They already own about 65-75% of all assets.

Why was FOX hyping Tea Parties, so the dumb little guy making under $250K a year would march around to protect the 1 percent who own most everything from paying their fair share of taxes. They put out the distortion that they are paying to much already 45+ percent of their income. The majority of their income comes not from salaries like us; but, from tax free bonds, dividends on stock/capital gains (15% tax rate). The Fox guys and the Freedom Foundationguys must be laughing the a--s off. You really can fool some of the people all of the time. Get them to concentrate and rave about family values, illegal, et-al while picking their pockets. You really can fool some of the people all of the time.

One more question where does the farm bill payout go. The majority go to zip codes in Ny,Ny and Wash. DC. Lot of little farm families there.

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
trucker40

05-04-2009 16:32:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
I agree,and if I could have said it like that I would have.I just get mad and the whole mess is so disgusting,even as I write I figure out more of it sometimes and get madder.Fox news is going to start a Civil War one day,Im ready right now.Ive taken this crap my whole life you cant have decent pay because some jerk has to fly around in an airplane and make a fool out himself in front of the world,treat our people like they are stupid,and then even get the dumba$$es to go along with them on their you have to have less so the rich people can have more.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
NE IA

05-04-2009 16:13:49




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
We had this discusion the other day with some friends that farm, some that don't. The subject was as to a young farmer can't buy a new tractor because of the unions / UAW. And mostly because of the retirment plan.

The one semi retired farmer got smacked in the face with --he gave $250.00 for his land years ago, and sold it for $7,500.00 per acre. Why the hell should he not sell it for $250.00 then the young farmer could then afford a new tractor. He had to leave for some business he said. Kinda like sharks with blood in the water.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
gun guru

05-04-2009 14:00:18




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
Your right, to a point but-----The UAW attitude and lazy I wont do an ounce of work unless it is on overtime is the reason for GM being where it is.

The work ethic is real bad, it got worse in the last 20-30 years. After guys kept pushing the envelope. (ask yourself and be honest now)--If you could goof off for 80% of any given day and not have to answer for your time would you goof off? I agree that the managers caved in to easily to the UAW demands. The real killer for the US based car companies is that the retirees suck down a lot of money and they were too stupid to see 30 years ago that the pensions must be eliminated, and that it would kill them financially.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
bobia

05-04-2009 16:43:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to gun guru, 05-04-2009 14:00:18  
the pensions were tacked on to wages back when retires were working only the co. never added to pension fund .Now they are charging them to the workers now. Double dipping I call it



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
trucker40

05-04-2009 16:23:12




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to gun guru, 05-04-2009 14:00:18  
You really think pensions have to be eliminated?????What the heck is wrong with you?What actually is happening is that the rich people are stealing everything they can from the working people,pension and all.Somewhere I saw where after everything was figured that the difference between the foreign car makers pay and Detroit pay was about 3 dollars an hour,and the rich toads want that 3 bucks and any more they can grab as well.These hogs wont be happy until they have people working for nothing or paying them to build their cars,there is no argument to it,never was.Now with the billions they stole from the government,and the billions they stole from the workers,and crying they are broke,you are really living in la la land to try and defend them and they arent paying the workers 30 dollars an hour any more,those billions amount to subsidy for the car makers and new hires get 15 an hour,just like the hogs getting farm payments that are movie stars and congressmen.Thats been going on almost from the beginning of farm subsidys.Way more government money is paid to people that might own 20 acres somewhere in California or even anywhere else,but because they are a big shot they get a subsidy payment.Once it sinks in you will get real mad,just dont blame me,Im only letting you know.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
LAA

05-04-2009 19:36:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to trucker40, 05-04-2009 16:23:12  
When the UAW finishes breaking the big 3 and they are all history, then all the slacksters already drawing pensions will be howling for your savior to ''bail out'' the pension fund. Your heroes, Obamma and Pelosi, will then tax all the real working people in the USA to pay ransom to their most dependable block of voters outside of ignorant minorities.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T-Rev

05-04-2009 15:37:24




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to gun guru, 05-04-2009 14:00:18  
They build these cars on assembly lines. Don't you think that you'd have to do the job all the time? Its kind of hard to build a car when you "only work during overtime". Think with your head next time you post.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
gun guru

05-04-2009 16:06:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to T-Rev, 05-04-2009 15:37:24  
I was referring to the skilled trades and non-production jobs, shipping and receiving, electricians, pipe-fitters, millwrights, janitors, etc.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
bobia

05-04-2009 16:46:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to gun guru, 05-04-2009 16:06:50  
have you worked these jobs to verify your thoughts? Most of the people have work to do if not prefabing and planning repair jobs. ry to use some common sense on your replys



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
tlak

05-04-2009 15:24:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to gun guru, 05-04-2009 14:00:18  
There's a lot of good Big-3 cars running around, somebody must have built them. I think you listen to the news hype that they don't do anything. Bout like the new showing the same three or four people messin over workers comp so now everybody that gets hurt is a WC cheat.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
trucker40

05-04-2009 16:39:50




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to tlak, 05-04-2009 15:24:32  
Workmans comp in this state is corrupt,has been for years and everybody knows it.There was a trucker that broke his back,workers comp never paid one cent.Right now somebody in my family has a broken back that happened on the job,2 years later not one penny from workmans comp.They have all the lawyers,workers cant afford a lawyer and they will keep it out of court or pay your lawyer off if you can get one,just hold out until you die,and not pay anything.Thats 2 cases right off that I can think of but there are lots and lots of horror stories everywhere in this country.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
GeneMO

05-04-2009 12:42:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
Why have all of our jobs gone to China and Mexico?

High taxes in the US

Workers comp. rules and regulations

Highpriced insurance due to bogus lawsuits and workers comp claims.

Complex tax code.

The need to hire attorneys to comply with all the rules and taxes.

Overly complex and onerous EPA rules.

Plaintiffs attorneys waiting in line to sue companies for every little thing their product may have caused.

Unions

fees, permits, licenses, etc.

These items and more have run many companies away.

Gene

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Steven f/AZ

05-04-2009 13:03:45




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to JML755, 05-04-2009 11:18:03  

JML755 said: (quoted from post at 11:18:03 05/04/09)... financial crisis (sub-prime mortgage meltdown) that led to a credit crisis (couldn't get a car loan even if you WANTED to buy a car)...


Who were these people that "couldn't" get a loan even if they wanted to?

Those of us who managed our credit wisely have been able to get loans, credit cards, mortgages, etc. without a hiccup at all. We walked into the bank and took out a sizeable unsecured personal loan with no trouble at all - the banker even asked, "Are you sure that's all you need?"

I guess I've never figured out where this "credit freeze" actually occurred...

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Buzzman72

05-04-2009 12:03:58




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to JML755, 05-04-2009 11:18:03  
I see that YOU can differentiate between UAW workers at the Big Three and UAW workers at the suppliers. A lot of folks lump us all together, when there are BIG differences in pay and benefits at the auto parts suppliers vs. what the workers at the Big Three get.

Yet a lot of folks are saying that if the suppliers go broke, it's no big deal...because the UAW workers at the suppliers are making $80 an hour like the Big Three workers, when that's DEFINITELY not the case. Because I was a UAW member, I was "supposedly" making $80 an hour and getting paid for NOT working...and it's just not the TRUTH.

And the TRUTH, as always, is the FIRST casualty in these battles. I just wanted to inject the TRUTH into this discussion that's turning into a bashing of ALL union workers, and ALL UAW members.

In the just-under 5 years I was at the frame plant [before they closed--I didn't quit, and I wasn't fired], the company had an annual attendance award of $500 for everyone who only used their allotted vacation and personal days, and had no unexcused absences. [And we could ONLY take vacation days during plant shutdown, at Christmastime and in July, so the company decided when we took our vacations.] I was eligible for the bonus four times. And I collected the bonus four times. So when I hear that crap about how those lazy union workers won't show up for work, it DOES get under my skin, because I know it's not the TRUTH.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Brian Jasper co. Ia

05-04-2009 12:29:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to Buzzman72, 05-04-2009 12:03:58  
In the middle 90's, my father-in-law retired from John Deere. Another big company represented by the UAW. In his last 6 months he had to bring magazines, books, stuff to work on because his dept was idle at full pay. It doesn't happen only at the big 3 auto makers...
You may show up for work, and I'll bet you would be the worker who picks up the slack for the guy who doesn't pull his weight. To me, that's a good thing. Problem is the unions make it all but impossible to fire the lousy employees. They also tell uneducated people they're worth huge hourly rates. Take them out of the union shop, and all they would be qualified for is greeting people at Wal-Mart. Below the neck no man is worth more than minimum wage.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Buzzman72

05-04-2009 12:44:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to Brian Jasper co. Ia, 05-04-2009 12:29:55  
At the frame plant, having reading material at your work station could get you a written reprimand. When the union distributed their newsletter, it was limited to the locker room, the lunchroom, and was only allowed on the plant floor if you were walking through out on your way to clock out.

I have a diagonal scar on my right wrist where some frame members shifted and I tried to catch them...and continued working the line until break, rather than stopping production to seek medical help. I used my own bandana as a bandage until I could access the first-aid stuff on break. [After that night, I switched from wearing the required welding sleeves, to wearing the Kevlar material-handling sleeves...job description be damned, sometimes you have to be practical]. I could've gotten on the radio and called for someone to relieve me, but in the interim we'd have lost some valuable production. And that production is what made my job, and my paycheck, possible.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Kelly C

05-04-2009 10:16:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
Not saying the Unions dont have a row to hoe here. But.....

It does seem that fox goes out and I mean out of their way to hammer unions.

Example: Remember the union meeting at the swanky hotel in Florida?
Fox tried to drum up some out rage for better than a week. About how the rooms cost $1000 a night. Should the unions be living it up when the country was in ressesion.

Come to find out. Union had negotiated rates of $150 a night. And was not being paid for by share holders or the goverment.
It was paid for from the unions money.
Fox still tried to beat the drum for a few more days any way.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Howard H.

05-04-2009 09:24:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  

Per a former worker:

"seemed stupid for me to go in on overtime because someone else did. all people did OT if one did. even if i had no parts to assemble. 12hr ot while laying on a pallet napping. "

How long would YOU stay in business paying top dollar to people sleeping on the clock???

Drawing top dollar in salaries on however many thousands of employees were pulling this kind of garbage while the company was getting no value in return is how they did it... Not to mention all the huge costs for pension "lifers"...

Vandalism & every known thug tactic in the book, if the union didn't get it's way, is how they did it...

Unions had their place 90 years ago. But there are so many people in other parts of the world willing to actually put in a day's productive work for a day's wages, that the simple law of supply & demand has FORCED any large scale manufacturing offshore and away from all this union garbage...

And that is why the companies that are still held by union strangleholds are now failing, too...

HH

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
douglas carroll

05-04-2009 09:20:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
Bring back IH, let them build an american truck, run the company by real americans and see how this economy bounces back



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
R U Goofy?

05-04-2009 10:12:23




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to douglas carroll, 05-04-2009 09:20:44  
IH or Navistar is still building so called trucks their latest top of the line truck is a friggin joke it has a gawd awful looking hood stuck in front of a S-series cab it looks to me they no longer make a real truck cab if they keep this crap up they will soon go the way of the tractor division



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Cas

05-04-2009 09:08:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
I had a dairy farm for 25 years. Took the buyout
in 1986 because the help damn near drove me nuts.
We paid well with good benefits. Worked in a union shop and it is much healthier and better.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JML755

05-04-2009 09:07:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
[quote="Dennis (VA)"](quoted from post at 10:27:48 05/04/09) Please explain how UAW doomed Detroit.

quote]

There's plenty of blame to go around. I worked at GM for a number of years and have spent the last 30 on the supplier side walking around ALL auto plants (GM, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda,etc).

You are right that there is a lot of mismanagement. For years I was incensed that our management continued to give in to the demands of the UAW. And yes, they did hold a gun to their head. They call it a strike. And none of the top guys had the cojones to stand up to the rank-and-file because they were afraid of the short term effect on profits. It's gotten to the point that GM has to ASK PERMISSION from the UAW to close a plant! Management years ago (think Gerstenberg, Murphy, Smith, Stempel, Eaton) tied the hands of those that came after them by buying labor peace when times were good and not worrying about the future. Short term profits fueled their bonuses. Now, the golden goose has been killed. And who suffers the most? The working people who are NOT in the union (farmers, truck drivers, hardware store owners, doctors, etc) who invested in Blue Chip stocks and bonds like GM and who have lost EVERYTHING.

The maddening thing is that the media makes it sound like the only hard-working people in America are UAW members in an Auto plant. Which is as far from the truth as you can get.

Anyone who has to supply equipment to a UAW plant knows that the inmates run the asylum. They write grievances for every little thing just so they can get extra money. I personally have had grievances written for silly things such as I opened a cabinet door without an electrician present. (He left because his break time was in 10 minutes. The machine was down and the plant mgr wanted it up ASAP. We would have had to wait almost a half hour until he returned).

Sorry for the rant, but when all is said and done, GM will follow the Chrysler blueprint in Bankruptcy, the UAW will own a majority stake in both and I will NEVER buy a car from either one of those companies again.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
COWSAM

05-04-2009 12:36:07




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to JML755, 05-04-2009 09:07:27  
I wonder why all the union-hating experts that are so bright are stock holders in these companies and losing all there hard earned money? I guess they will be happy when every worker in america rents a trailer-house so they can complain about the trailer park.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Traditional Farmer

05-04-2009 08:28:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
It was a joint effort by a whole bunch of Idiots that drove GM into the ground Mangement,UAW and worst of all the American Public that kept blindly buying the overpriced junk they were building just to 'Buy American Made'.Look like the Party's over



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jiles

05-04-2009 08:16:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
I draw a retirement from ALCOA Aluminum. They are the biggest aluminum producing plant in the world.
Altough thet are troubled today, as virtually all industry in the world, it baffles me as to how they got this big since for years, they have been paying UNION wages and Retirement.
Management makes or breaks a company!
I might add that I have two close friends that are drawing retirements that are greater then what I draw. They were not organized!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
bruster

05-04-2009 09:21:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Jiles, 05-04-2009 08:16:13  
It's true that some union companies do well, like UPS, Yellow/Roadway and other teamster companies. But the UAW has had the most light shed on them since the Big 3 have floundered.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Mike M

05-04-2009 08:15:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
I used to be a GM fan. USED to BE ! I got tired of fixing every little thing on them and all the oil leaks.

So who's fault is it they built JUNK ? the executives ? UAW ? or all of them combined ?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jiles

05-04-2009 10:16:31




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Mike M, 05-04-2009 08:15:35  
I drove GM products for years. One day I realized that GM "experiments with people"!
I could write a book on GM blunders, vehicles that were complete failures because they were not tested properly. They built the vehicle and let the consumer test it.
Just ONE example---350 Gas engine turned into a diesel!! I bought one and it was my last GM product.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
chester5731

05-04-2009 08:03:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
Can we all say Dennis is a UAW member?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
dhermesc

05-04-2009 07:57:39




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
So you think FOX News destroyed the auto companies? How'd that happen?



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Germ

05-04-2009 07:57:25




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
"Why was FOX hyping Tea Parties, so the dumb little guy making under $250K a year would march around to protect the 1 percent who own most everything from paying their fair share of taxes. They put out the distortion that they are paying to much already 45+ percent of their income. The majority of their income comes not from salaries like us; but, from tax free bonds, dividends on stock/capital gains (15% tax rate). The Fox guys and the Freedom Foundationguys must be laughing the a--s off. You really can fool some of the people all of the time. Get them to concentrate and rave about family values, illegal, et-al while picking their pockets. You really can fool some of the people all of the time."

Dennis, I'm not dumb by any stretch, but I am a little guy that can read, do math, and see the rug being pulled out from under us. There are many more just like me. I think you, like many others really miss the point about the tea parties. Do you really think that with the amount of spending going on that cutting taxes for 95% and raising them on the top 5% will come even close to keeping our country from bankruptcy? Do the math. You may not see your payroll taxes increase, but every other tax under the sun and some they probably haven't even thought of yet, will eat up more and more of your paycheck. Raise tax on business, it gets passed on to the consumer. Raise fees, raise energy cost through cap and trade. These are taxes that aren't called a tax. It's going happen and it's going to be ugly.

Currently, my kids ages 13, 15, and 18 collectively will owe an estimated $367,500(I've seen numbers from $111,000 to $134,000 for each kid so I averaged at $122,500) in just interest on the current borrowing based on the out of control spending. That is with no principal paydown figured in. Our kids and their kids have no future with this mess. The tea parties are a back to the basics, spend responsibly, and return to smaller government.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Jim in N M

05-04-2009 07:47:35




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
Now Dennis, Calm down, I never worked in the auto business, But I truly believe that the unions have destroyed a lot of this country. I worked many years in the teamsters union and they are/were the most corupt bunch. I don't think any guy working in an auto plant is worth $80.00 an hour,as alot of them never finished school,and only got their jobs because their father or uncle worked there. I believe if the unions were kicked out GM and the rest could servive. Maybe I'm all wet ,but thats my take..Jim in N M

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
rusty wheel

05-04-2009 12:42:13




Report to Moderator
 Re: OT UAW in reply to Jim in N M, 05-04-2009 07:47:35  
Hey Jim in NM. Wherever did you get the idea that UAW represented workers received $80.00/hr. I retired from G M after 33 years in skilled trades and I assure you sir that no hourly worker ever received that kind of pay. I was earning $28.00/hr when I retired and I earned my money every day. Everyone always talks about how much money the auto workers make and how uneducated they are. Well, let me tell you, I spent four years in college to learn my trade and I did this while I worked 40 hours/week and raised a family. Believe me it wasn't easy. You never hear about how much money I saved the company. If the company had outsourced my job on a daily basis, it would have cost them thousands of dollars a day instead of the $230.00 they paid me. Maybe you union bashers should think about living conditions for the working people before the time of organized labor. Is that what you want?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

05-04-2009 07:44:21




Report to Moderator
 Pure hogwash in reply to Dennis (VA), 05-04-2009 07:27:48  
The UAW had a lot of input on how GM did things, including marketing, vehicle design decisions, vehicle plant decisions, management choices, etc. Years back, they did not. Their quasi-control is analaogous to how teachers unions now run state governments via their strong lobbyists. Politicians are afraid to stand up to the teachers unions, and GM execs were afraid to stand up to the UAW.

Do some reading about the ever increasing, incremental involvement and control the UAW got over the years with GM decision making.

That being said, although the Unions are a huge detriment, nobody put a gun to the heads of GM execs and made them give in to the UAW, year after year. Ultimately, it was poor management, taking the easy way out and short-term fixes, year after year.

By the way, I don't watch FOX, but I CAN read.

Also, do you recall what the UAW did to John Deere back in the 80s? At the time, the UAW attempted to cripple John Deere Company as a "show of force", to scare General Motors. Looks like it worked. Many small Deere dealers went out of business because of the UAW strike. Our's barely survived, but never really recovered. We lost many loyal Deere customers, who switched brands after not being able to buy parts for almost a year.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
georgeky

05-04-2009 09:27:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to jdemaris, 05-04-2009 07:44:21  
They striked against IH too and was the straw that broke the camels back.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Spook

05-04-2009 08:42:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to jdemaris, 05-04-2009 07:44:21  
I am a UAW member, and I really don't know about a Deere strike in the 80's. We have had some less than stellar leadership, but strikes are a funny thing. The local has to call the strike, by taking a strike vote. The local has to convince it's members to strike. And then get approval from the International for a strike. At the bottom, all strikes are local. I just can't see the striker's at Deere wanting to scare GM. And GM would not give a rip. Most of us see the union as being in bed with GM. The union does try to influence product plant decisions. To very little results. One example was the Arlington, Texas assembly plant. It was going to close in the mid 80's. But the H. Ross Perot got on GM's board. So Ypsilanti, Michigan was closed. GM is still shipping engines, stampings, trannies and whatever from Michigan to Texas. The Ypsi plant was closer, cheaper, more efficient. But politics ruled. As a good example of poor leadership, calling the Cat strike in the 90's was stupid. Sales were slow, Cat had a lot of inventory, and it didn't have model years - their inventory had a long shelf life. The union did Cat a favor. One thing to keep in mind, the international union has been on a downhill path itself since the 70's. They really want the companies to do well, but often have trouble talking the locals into concessions. I know a lot of guys in my local have very unrealistic views on the company and on economics. The guys at the international are better educated, more realistic. I think one of the biggest problems at GM was the decision making. Everything was done by committee, so if it turned out bad, no one manager would take the blame. A lot of CYA activity!!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Buzzman72

05-04-2009 09:54:26




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to Spook, 05-04-2009 08:42:59  
I'm a former UAW member who worked in a plant that built frames for Ford Explorers. The high hourly pay for plant workers, excluding maintenance and other "skilled trades," was $16.29 an hour, NOT $80. We didn't get the supplemental unemployment benefits (SUB) that the Ford workers got. While our insurance was decent, it wasn't as good as what the Ford workers got. We didn't have a company funded pension; we had a 401(k) plan like many other non-union Americans. We didn't have a "jobs bank" that kept workers on the payroll for doing nothing; in fact, layoffs happened a lot after the 2002 Explorers went into production. I know some folks who were laid off and called back 3 times in the 5 years I was at the plant.

You wanna know what closed our plant and put 800 people out of work? Management rolled the dice and lost. Between 2002-2005, China started buying up lots of American steel, and steel prices went crazy...while our company was under a contract as to how much we were paid for each frame. As Ford ot ready to change the frames for the 2005--which got pushed back to 2006--model year, and ask for bids on the new frame contract, Ford decided that they wanted to pay LESS per frame, even though raw materials costs had gone through the roof.

So our company decided they were going to call Ford's bluff,and refused to bid on building frames on which they were sure to lose money. Dana Corp. also refused to bid, because they did the math and realized they'd lose their butts building them for the price Ford wanted to pay as well. To hedge their bets, in the unlikely event that somebody,somewhere, bid on building those frames for Ford, our company took the accounting procedure of taking the entire asset value of our plant off their books...thereby showin a paper "loss," and further "justifying" the idea that our company couldn't afford to build those frames for less.

But then a wild card was dealt. Canada's Frank Stronach and his MAGNA Corp. not only bid on the contract to build the frames for Ford, but offered to build an all-new facility at Bowling Green, to do the work. And, as the sole bidder, MAGNA got the contract.

So our company closed the plant. Nothing the UAW local could do to keep the doors open...we offered to cut waes and benefits, but the company had no product to build there. Company officials told us that steel prices, not labor costs, were the problem.

In 2001, Ford was selling as many as 40,000 Explorers A MONTH; last sales report I read, that figure was currently under 4,000 a month. At that volume, I'm not sure how MAGNA has been able to keep their doors open, much less pay for the fixtures and equipment required to build the frames...because higher volume usually translates to less per-unit costs.

But the UAW didn't cause the closing of the frame plant where I worked...high raw materials costs and management gambling did. So I resent the blanket accusation that the UAW is solely, or even primarily, responsible for the sad shape of the US automotive industry...because it's pure bu11shit.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

05-04-2009 09:29:30




Report to Moderator
 UAW and Deere Co. in reply to Spook, 05-04-2009 08:42:59  
At the time when the UAW brought a strike against John Deere parts supply, the UAW made a public statement saying they were going to show how important parts supply is to any equipment and/or auto business and GM better watch closely, because they might be next in line. That was their public statement/press release.

It did indeed cripple Deere Company. We had no new parts available for a long time. At our own dealership, we changed over to fixing Deere tractors with aftermarket parts and used - and managed to survive. But, we made out becase we were not dependent on making money from parts sales. But we lost many new equipment sales and long-time Deere customers.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
T-Rev

05-04-2009 18:50:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: UAW and Deere Co. in reply to jdemaris, 05-04-2009 09:29:30  
John Deere has lost a lot of customers because they only make equipment for trillion acre farmers. They get off on doubling the size of planters and combines. I"ve even talked to the corporate offices about it. You want to talk about short sighted when it comes to your customer base.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Rexalot

05-04-2009 09:23:19




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to Spook, 05-04-2009 08:42:59  
I worked for a company that had AMFA for our union. In order for the company to remain profitable the company was outsourcing most of the maintenance. It also was trying to cut manpower cost and was trying to change how it paid most of the mechanics who did alot of overseas flying with the aircraft. In short our local AMFA rep decided that the union members wouldn't deal or negotiate for the "new" contract and therefore never gave us, the members a chance to vote. Many of us saw the future, and would've likely made the change. In the end I lost my position with a company that I was at for 19 years. They filed bankruptcy 6 months later.

I blame the union for my exit. The company was mismanaged without doubt. It may have made no change. Unions are a business unto there own... don't for one minute think they are just out to help you fight the big corporation. They get profits from the number of members...

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Buzzman72

05-04-2009 09:58:30




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to Rexalot, 05-04-2009 09:23:19  
So how was it to the union's advantage to lose all those jobs, if "they get their profits from the numbers of members" ?? Seems to me that if a company closes and files bankruptcy, the number of union members gets SMALLER.

Simple first-grade math shows the fallacy of your argument.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
paul

05-04-2009 12:06:53




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to Buzzman72, 05-04-2009 09:58:30  
Buzz, your question is the big one. I don't understand either.

Management makes a lot of dumb moves.

So do union brass.

Both seem out to hurt the little guy - any make him a peg in a board game, not a real person.

I don't understand why anyone would want another set of govt layer over the top of them - a union. That's all it is.

Now, not all unions are bad, and not all managent is good. There is enough dumb management in both. And some good bright people in both making good choices as well.

But your question is a good one, and if asked fairly - why wouldn't the union brass give the local workers a voice in something that so deeply affected them?

--->Paul

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
James Hoffa

05-04-2009 18:38:04




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to paul, 05-04-2009 12:06:53  
I hope the unions enjoy their great wages and benefits when people wise up and stop buying their overpriced, underperforming cars and they go out of business.

Toyota and Honda are increasing sales because they build a superior product at a reasonable price. The Big 3 are done, it's only a matter of time. Protectionism has never worked and never will. Remember, without customers you don't need overpaid worthless employees.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Larry NE IL

05-04-2009 19:34:20




Report to Moderator
 Re: Pure hogwash in reply to James Hoffa, 05-04-2009 18:38:04  
HHMMM, I've ALWAYS driven Chrysler products, even to this day and LOVE 'em. You are righrt about Toyota and Honda moving out ahead. That has been the trend for the last 10 years or so...anything made in the USA is JUNK! Only the stuff from the Europeans or Asians is good.
Sorry My friend, but I don't buy that.
Most folks that drive the Hondas and Toyotas and other foriegn brands haven't bought an American auto for many years....they just know that US stuff is JUNK.
That's why we are paying billions to keep the companys afloat...good for Honda and Toyota!

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy