Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Crawlers, Dozers, Loaders & Backhoes Discussion Forum

sm. crawler comparison

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
lizardtrack

04-07-2004 18:48:06




Report to Moderator

I'm looking for a project to do with the kids, how do the oc's, JD's and small case crawlers compare as far as parts, capability, ease to work on, value etc. what about engine swaps if you have a good machine with a bad motor. Thanks for the input guys it's fun reading all your different comments, there's s ton of experience out there. Lizardtrack




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Karen

04-08-2004 03:57:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: sm. crawler comparison in reply to lizardtrack, 04-07-2004 18:48:06  
Well this may get old jdemaris fired up, but maybe George has him so fired up this doesn't effect him,,,lol.. My friend with the crawler parts yard says that without JD he be about out of business. They have weak steering and weak finals as per his sales being 1/3 those parts for JD crawlers. NOW he did say that most was owner not doing maintiance and checking and using machine like they should. He says if you are going to push anything stay away from the HG's and early OC3's as they were made to pull equipment and were weak where the frame meets the tranny . Late OC3&OC4 were much better and he does have 50-60 of these machines for parts, and has almost as much as Zimmerman as far as replacement parts for HG;OC3 OC4 crawlers. He likes the Case 310,320,420,350 for a home owner machine! Only weak spot is final drive axle/spocket&spocket nut. They are simple to work on, have wet steering brakes, parts are available and not expensive, and they are a pushing little machine...cheaper to fix than Deere. Parts more plentiful and cheaper than Oliver. We wouldn't even talk about IH as all their small machines parts are VERY hard to find and expensive So with Eddie's guidance there's my $0.02 worth

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

04-08-2004 06:02:03




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: sm. crawler comparison in reply to Karen, 04-08-2004 03:57:44  
Fired up? No, I only do that when someone pees down my back and tells me it's raining. Or, tries to tell me that Cletrac HGs and OC3 give full power to both tracks, all the time - which they absolutely DO NOT! Never have, never will- unless you weld the differential spur gears together. As far as the Deeres go - I worked as a Deere mechanic most of my life and am well aquainted with the good and bad ones. Putting parts side by side, the Deeres are absolutely more rugged - but they also tend to be worked harder, thusly break down more, etc. This whole "collector" thing still seems new to me. It wasn't very long ago that MCs, 40s, 420s, 440s, 1010s etc. were user's machines, not collector's - and were being used daily in the woods or quarry. We had a lot of them come into the dealership for repair, and that's saying something since dealer labor rates are always high. Most little Cletracs, by this time, were sitting in a field somewhere with mice living in them. We had a rental business besides selling new and used and worked on plenty of Cases. No little Cletracs, though - they were always "el cheapo" machines and never made it into the dealership. I will add though, that Cletrac was ahead of its time with some of their track designs. I also know several old contractors that specialized in road and pond building 50-60 years ago, and most will tell you that Cletrac had one of the best crawlers on the market. Not the small ones, I'm referring to the bigger machines like the BD. And, off course this all depends what area you live in. My area has always been a Deere area. I can drive 50 miles and hit an IH area. And so on, and so forth. The area also affects how long these machines last. When we were selling Deere 350C crawlers new, they were getting busted to pieces. Final drives, clutch housings, transmission cases, side frames, reversers, etc. Seems like they were all we worked on. But, many we sold had winches on them and were used for bunching 3-5 logs at a time, building roads, and jumping off small cliffs. We also have a lot of hardpan, which is not easy on a crawler. I went to work for a dealer in New Jersey for awhile, and could not believe the difference in how the crawlers held up. Since the soil was all sand and clay with no hard pan, and there was no logging going on, the crawlers virutally lasted forever with nothig cracking or breaking - even the 1010s.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Joe Giordano

04-07-2004 20:38:54




Report to Moderator
 Re: sm. crawler comparison in reply to lizardtrack, 04-07-2004 18:48:06  
I have a John Deere 440 crawler for sale, also an IH T4 which is quite rare. I always have several small crawlers for sale, I also have quite a collection of my own. email dozerjoe@yahoo.com if interested



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

04-07-2004 20:04:00




Report to Moderator
 Re: sm. crawler comparison in reply to lizardtrack, 04-07-2004 18:48:06  
Deere is the best built crawler (in my opinion) as far as being rugged goes. But, for a project, the little Cletrac HGs or OC3s are easier to work on and use a lot more generic parts. Some of the small Cases use much of the same powertrain as the Cletrac, but the later Cases use their own engines whereas the Cletacs have Hercules. I've worked on them all and own several Cletacs and Deeres and one Terratrac. Case bought Terratrac, that's how they got into the crawler business. Parts from Deere are high. Some Case parts are scarce. Cletrac parts are easy to find and usually much more reasonable. Zimmermans in PA specializes in them, and can sell you just about any part you might need. Deere will usually have higher resale, but with the small crawlers - I'm not so sure anymore. I've been seeing the little HGs bring some good prices.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
back40

04-08-2004 04:53:11




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: sm. crawler comparison in reply to jdemaris, 04-07-2004 20:04:00  
I just completely replaced the undercarriage on my Case 310G. Parts were not a problem to find new. I completely rebuilt the finals, new rollers, carriers, idlers, sprockets, chains, pads, seat etc. Powerful little machine. Probably didn't need to replace everything, but I decided that since I had it all torn down to replace the idlers, chains and 1 axle shaft, I thought I might as well do it all.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
jdemaris

04-08-2004 05:34:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: sm. crawler comparison in reply to back40, 04-08-2004 04:53:11  
Yeah, I've had the same experience, but . . . I've been warned from several souces that many of those parts are being phased out and won't be available in another year or so. And, it's not just with Case. Same thing is going on with parts for my Allis Chalmers and IH crawlers. At least with the Cletrac, AGCO is reproducing a lot of parts that are specific to that crawler, and lots of the other stuff is availble from generic suppliers. Zimmerman sometimes makes parts at his shop when not available elsewhere. Also, at least in my area, the Cletrac HGs and OC3s are kind of like the Model Ts of the tractor world. They were all over the place and used parts are easy to find. I know where there over 20 parts machines right now. In fact, I found a pair of them yesterday I might buy for $500. I can't say the same for Deere or Case. I do know where there are a few, but at the salvage yard, they are reluctant to sell parts off those mahcines - if you want something you have to buy the whole thing. The small Case crawlers use the same transaxle and brake bands as the Cletracs, it's made by Clark. The undercarriage was used on certain types of mining equipment, the engines of course can be found many places, regardless if it's the Continental or later Case engines.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Lavoy

04-08-2004 08:57:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: Re: Re: Re: sm. crawler comparison in reply to jdemaris, 04-08-2004 05:34:17  
As to parts availibility on the Deere crawlers, we have a good selection of new, used, and rebuilt parts for the old Deere crawlers. We are adding new different parts as soon as we get them made or can source them.
I am kind of partial to Deere, but like JDEMARIS have other brands. TO say that the finals are only weak on the Deere's is not true. The OC's and HG's are commomly broken in the final drive area. T340 IH's often will have a brace added to the finals to strengthen them. About the only old small crawler I have with a good heavy final is the H3/HD3 Allis, but I can tell you a host of other things on the crawler that are substantially poorer than Deere.
The bottom line is buy what you like, or are interested in, and go from there.
Lavoy

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy