jdemaris
03-15-2005 05:23:16
|
Re: john deere 450 price $$$$$$$ in reply to Mike from central ny, 03-14-2005 21:00:12
|
|
The 350 series went through a lot more changes than the 450 series - probably because the 450 held up better and didn't have as many problems. 350 replaced the 1010, and the 450 replaced the 2010. First 450 had the same engine format at the 350 with one extra cylinder - so, if diesel, the 350 has the three-cylinder 152 engine, and the first 450s have the four-cylinder 202 engine. 450 series had two horsepower increases by the time the C series came around. The "C" was the first to have wet steering clutches. Other than the wet clutches and horsepower increases, other changes were minor. When comparing the 350 series to the 450, the 450 has a much more rugged undercarriage, more weight, horsepower/pushing power, high-low-forward hydraulic shuttle (if equipped with the HL-R) insead of just forward and reverse as in the 350 (with optional reverser), and the steering clutches in all the 450s can be removed without pulling the final drives off. That's a big plus. When it comes to crawler loaders specifically, I don't know what Deere was thinking when they built the 1010s and the following 350s. They are very underpowered for loader use. When the late 350Cs or early D series came out, the engine size and horsepower was finally increased - went to a 179 c.i. engine. But . . . I don't recall ever seeing a 350C loader - Deere might have stopped making 350 sized loaders by then. I know our dealership didn't sell any. I worked for Deere dealerships for 30 years. The last place I worked at, we had a Case industrial dealer across the road from us. We used to make fun of the Case stuff - referred to them all as "oil heaters", mainly because of their torque-converter drives. Now that I've gotten to work on several Cases, including my neighbor who's had two 580CK backhoes and two 450 crawlers since new - I'm kind of impressed with them. He's never had a torque-converter problem with any of them - and they are a lot easier to work on then the Deeres.
|
|
|