Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Crawlers, Dozers, Loaders & Backhoes Discussion Forum

case 450 vs cat 941

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
Doug, Ontario

04-20-2005 20:20:41




Report to Moderator

I have been looking for a good case 450 for some time and am starting to get impatient. When ever I see one that is pretty good its always $1000 of freight away. There seems to be alot of cat loader crawlers in my area, but I know nothing about them (not that I know alot about the cases) but I have heard that they are expensive and or difficult to work on vs the case.

There is a cat 941 comming up for auction near me next month and I was wonder how it compares to the case. I am hoping to use it for general use around the farm. Building some trails, clearing some bush ect. Not crazy big stuff, but big enought that I would like around 15k lbs.

Thanks for any advice/Doug

[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Deas Plant

04-22-2005 18:07:37




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to Doug, Ontario, 04-20-2005 20:20:41  
Hi, Folks. In reality this comparison is like chalk and cheese. Just 'cos they start with the same letter don't mean they are comparable. The Ford/Cadillac analogy in an earlier post is not nearly as silly as it may sound to some people.

The Cat 941 is more comparable to 850 or 1150 Cases than to the 450. The 941 is a 12-13 ton machine with around 90 horsepower (And they ALL work.)

The company I work for has been in business for over 30 years and has been using Cat 941's for 23 years now. They started off with Case 850's, 1150's and eventually one 1450. They DON'T have any Cases left. The first 941 they bought, secondhand 23 years ago, was STILL a runner up to about 3 years ago. It IS a parts machine now.

The Case machines very nearly sent him broke. He found that he HAD to replace them about every 3 years as the cost of keeping them running escalated rapidly with age and usage. Remember that these machines were being asked to do a SOLID day's work, six days a week.

Now please don't get me wrong. I am not saying that Case are not a good machine. I have operated a few and enjoyed them but for different reasons from enjoying operating Cats. The Cases are faster and lighter and there-in lie some of their problems. They DO NOT have the engineering built into them that the Cats have. Because they are faster AND lighter, they tend to tear themselves to bits if not operated with due consideration for their speed and lightness.

Case machines ARE cheaper to run than COMPARABLE Cats. Original purchase price, parts and fuel consumption all play a part in this. However, the statement made earlier in this thread that Cats require a lot of specialised tools is not quite true. Yes, they do require a FEW specialised tools but you oughta see what we do with them in our workshop with just a fistful of of assorted wrenches, a hammer, a pair of pliers, a couple of screwdrivers, good 1/2" and 3/4" drive socket sets and a welder and oxy-acetylene gear.

The Cats do have one little quirk that takes some people a while to get used to. The bucket crowd lever works what appears to be 'bass-ackwards' at first glance. You push it forward to crowd the bucket and pull it back to dump. May I suggest that you take the time to get used to it if you buy one. It works in VERY well with the hoist lever that way for using one hand on both levers together.

It doesn't matter what machine you eventually buy, a ripper and a 4-in-1 bucket will make it a LOT more useful and versatile. 4-in-1 buckets do not dig or load as well as a general purpose bucket but how much loading of trucks does the average farmer or hobbyist with a track loader actually do?

To sum up, if you want a machine to do a LOT of heavy work on an on-going basis, buy the Cat. If your work is lighter and you are not working to a deadline but can take your time and go gently, the Case may well do your work. The bottom line is always dollars and cents and Cases are cheaper to run. However, there is also a need to strike a balance between the amount of time spent in the saddle and the time spent looking at it, cussing it out and skinning your knuckles repairing it. The Cat will very likely come out well in front in that department.

Now I'd bet that there will be a few dyed-in-the-wool Case fans who will not like what I have just said. TOUGH. How many of them have over 40 years in the saddle on almost every type of earthmoving equipment known to the Western world. (Excluding Mexico and Asia - #1 RB's and 'Chinese Euclids'.)

Hope this helps.

You all have a wonderful day.
Best wishes.
Deas Plant.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
seann

04-22-2005 19:08:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to Deas Plant, 04-22-2005 18:07:37  
Thanks for the input Deas, and good see you again. I always enjoy reading your very informative posts.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
John Van Valkenburgh

04-22-2005 16:07:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to Doug, Ontario, 04-20-2005 20:20:41  
I might as well put in my 2 cents worth...

I've used Cat machines years ago and was quite impressed with their durability and performance. Now several years later my wife and I bought 10 acres of wooded land that we plan to build a small horse farm on. I was in a similar position as you in that I wanted a machine but it was going to have to be something I could afford to buy and operate.

After asking around and generally looking about I came to this conclusion. Cat is the best machine but the most expensive to purchase and maintain. Case is a good machine, some would say a bit more durable than John Deere, and as these things go the parts costs are on the lower end of the scale.

Another factor for me was cost of operating, or fuel usage. I believe that the Case 450 is probably pretty good on fuel. Its big enough to do what I need to do but small enough to be economical. Its also small enough for an "experienced amateur" like me to safely handle.

The bottom line for me then was that the Case 450 was the way to go. Another factor to consider is what you are going to use the machine for. If I were in the "business" and used the machine daily then I'd probably spring for the Cat.

One more factor to consider is maintenence and repair. I do most of my own work. The Case 450 with the 188 Diesel engine is really quite simple. I have found that so far while the service manual often calls for "special factory tools" for a particular operation, I have been able to get by with regular stuff I've got in the shop. I can also make some of the more simple tools. An example of this is the sleeve puller. I'll make one myself out of bar stock and threaded rod. Its nice to have a welder and torch.

The Case 450 I bought was made in 1968. Sure enough after I began to put it to serious work the engine suddenly started having lots of blowby. Thus I'm in the middle of an in-frame rebuild. These things happen and its good practice to set aside time and money for them when buying older used machines.

I'm sorry I don't have any direct experience with the Cat 941. If its anything like their articulating wheel loaders, I'm sure its a nice machine. My advice is to shop around and be honest with yourself about your abilities and expectations.

Best of luck,
John
1968 Case 450

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Doug, Ontario

04-22-2005 17:32:57




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to John Van Valkenburgh, 04-22-2005 16:07:29  
Thanks John for your response. My main concern is it breaking and having to figure out how to fix it when I am in the bush 500 meters from the barn. Sounds like the cases are one of the easiest to work on. Economical is good too. Most of the work I plan to do is more akin to me playing than working.

Thanks/Doug



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Doug, Ontario

04-22-2005 17:32:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to John Van Valkenburgh, 04-22-2005 16:07:29  
Thanks John for your response. My main concern is it breaking and having to figure out how to fix it when I am in the bush 500 meters from the barn. Sounds like the cases are one of the easiest to work on. Economical is good too. Most of the work I plan to do is more akin to me playing than working.

Thanks/Doug



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
stressfree

04-21-2005 03:08:27




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to Doug, Ontario, 04-20-2005 20:20:41  
doug i have a case 450 and ran 941s on road construction.a cat is a cat,but the high low track 100% beats cat.case is cheaper to fix.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Doug, Ontario

04-21-2005 04:03:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to stressfree, 04-21-2005 03:08:27  
Thanks for your reply. I am not that familiar with crawlers. When you say a Cat is a Cat, are you saying that the cat is so much better its worth it?

How big is the 941? How old might it be?

Thanks again/Doug



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
steve1

04-23-2005 09:24:44




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to Doug, Ontario, 04-21-2005 04:03:22  
Doug, I"ve read your threads and responses/replys.
I do have the case 1978 450 crawler/loader with the factory extendahoe. I am using it to clear brush, scrub oak and manzanita in so. Ca. The machine had 2 owners before me, shows 4500 hours, track/sprokets are at 40%. It runs okay, noisy. I could have gotten by with a larger machine, it would have been faster. HOwever, the case is 12,000 lbs w/0 the hoe. I can pull this around myself...to take it in for repairs when I can"t do it myself. The 4 in 1 bucket is a must have! with the teeth on the bucket, it works a little like a root rake. I"d like to have a real rake, but can"t justify 1500 bucks for one, besides, I will build one that works with the front clam on the 4-1 at a later time. I paid 15,000 US + 1000 shipping, 400 miles away. I shopped around too. I was able to set all of this up as a (local)business, for tax purposes as well, It takes a little of the sting out. I am not stingy, just a bit frugal. I am building this retirement home on 5 acres out of pocket. I will sell the Case in a few years or less, when I am done. And while its in my possesion,do some side work w/it, for a small profit. Be patient about looking for your equipment, and be prepared to spend some $$. While the loader is not a replacement for a dozer, it doz what I need it to do. The Case has other attachments that I would like to have, there out there but tough to find. Manual,(shop), are good to have too. but expensive, even the used ones. I would like to find a close by owner to swap attachments with. I also would like a 6 way blade! HA and while i am at it...I like to have someone else do all of this for me!! hahaha. Have a great life and help out your neighbors, thats where I am going right now. Can smell that diesel already!...sl

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Richard T

04-26-2005 04:36:47




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to steve1, 04-23-2005 09:24:44  
As a matter of interest, how do you find the hoe in terms of dis/advantages ? I bought a (UK built, ie with David Brown mill but otherwise standard) 450 late last year and find it a mixed blessing. Obviously a useful tool but it seriously affects weight distribution and the long, low-slung overhang doesn't help, gouging the surface on even modest concave slopes. I just finished getting it unstuck from deep in some nasty blue clay (hiding under a nice firm crust) with the help of lots of logs and a series of pushes from the hoe, but I'm not sure it would have dug itself in in the first place without the hoe...

On the other hand it made getting a thrown track back on the sprocket a lot easier a couple of months ago.

Any views ?

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
steve1

04-26-2005 07:52:29




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to Richard T, 04-26-2005 04:36:47  
Richard, yes, the weight distribution is somthing to deal with, even with a wheel Loader backhoe. Currently, the hoe is off and I am clearing brush. I was stuck, 3 feet deep in some kind of muck, on a slight angle, (going into an old, dry,(I thought) pond, to pull out my nieghbor. I probably could have pulled myself out with the hoe, if it were on. But it wasn't. I had to wait a few weeks for things to dry up. I would like to find a 3 point hitch, (factory would be nice), to attach other accessories. Regarding the "long, low-slung overhang", Are you talking about the low mount at the botom of the hoe, or where the boom mounts? I haven't used the hoe much, only a little on flat ground. It will work for what I purchased it for. (home building and site work). being a UK machine, are you in the UK as well? I don't detect an accent...sl

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Richard T

04-27-2005 01:09:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to steve1, 04-26-2005 07:52:29  
Yes Steve, specifically the Scottish Borders. I meant the hoe mounting itself which i estimate is 50%+ of the track length and only around 15" above ground level. Tracked backhoe loaders are rare here and it seemed the best tool for the broad range of tasks we have though I'm having to learn to work within its limitations. Everything has those, of course and in an ideal world we'd all have a range of kit for different tasks.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
steve1

04-27-2005 09:01:17




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to Richard T, 04-27-2005 01:09:22  
Richard, you wrote, "of course and in an ideal world we'd all have a range of kit for different tasks".

That would be fun, I find myself looking at all kinds of possibilities and different kinds of equipment. I don't have a set of torches or a welder...YET. when that does happen, I suppose that I'll be comming up with all sorts of things.

I ve only clocked 30 hours on this machine, it's relitively new to me. I purchased a CD from ebay. it was advertised as a service manual. In reality it's only a maintaince manual. It covers the basic 450 and the backhoes, can't remember all of the models. shoot me an address and I send you a copy if you like...sl

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
michael dipierro

04-21-2005 10:49:14




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to Doug, Ontario, 04-21-2005 04:03:22  
Hi i owned a 850 case and still own a 941-B cat. lets put it this way . Did you ever drive ford versus a cadillac. The case was alright arund the farm. But i could not put on job.You cant beat this machine .Two of my friends own 941-B.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
seann

04-21-2005 13:43:08




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to michael dipierro, 04-21-2005 10:49:14  
Michael - Your comments about the Cadillac/Ford analogy are interesting. I don't own a Case or a Cat, but I've always heard the Cases are really good machines. Not "better" than a Cat (which by nearly all accounts are very good), but basically comparable given same vintage/size/type. Also, I've heard that Cases are easier to repair and do not require specialized tools like the Cats do (which is significant for the farm owner/small privateer).

Some more details would be interesting to hear about....and not that I'm trying to get a brand name flame war going! lol

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Doug, Ontario

04-21-2005 17:10:32




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to seann, 04-21-2005 13:43:08  
Thanks for your comments, but if you could elaborate.

Is the cat more reliable? More effective in work?

How would I find out the specs on the 941 cat? I would appreciate if someone could let me know weight and vintage.

Thanks again/Doug



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
stressfree

04-21-2005 17:37:06




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to Doug, Ontario, 04-21-2005 17:10:32  
cat is made to last 2 life times.case is one.cat you have to have deep pockets to repair.case like all machines cost money but within range.my case 450 will do the same job as our 941 cat. the 941 has a lot more hp but loading trucks and lot clearing its ok.941 is $20000 more.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Nat

04-22-2005 18:52:52




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to stressfree, 04-21-2005 17:37:06  
Your Case 450 will do the same job as a Cat 941, if you are talking about loading the bucket with dirt and dumping it out. So will a shovel, but they aren't comparable. A 941 weighs nearly 2 times the 450 and nearly twice the HP. I ran a HD-4 AC for a couple years and sold it and bought a 931 Cat. Both would dig a basement, both would clear a lot, but the cat was bigger, more HP and would do it a lot faster. A freind of mine ran a 941, a 951, and a955 Cat. He called the 941 the little loader, but it would do the job in half the time it took me with the 933. HTH, Nat

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
JimInOz

04-21-2005 19:57:22




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to stressfree, 04-21-2005 17:37:06  
The Cat will drink more fuel,but is capable of heavier work.The Case are a good unit too,certainly more economical & work OK too.I'd prefer to sit on the Cat any day,I just like the layout & feel of that style of Cat.Some Case guys would never own anything but Case...similar to Cat guys.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
stressfree

04-22-2005 03:12:33




Report to Moderator
 Re: case 450 vs cat 941 in reply to JimInOz, 04-21-2005 19:57:22  
but when they break we still curse them.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy