Welcome! Please use the navigational links to explore our website.
PartsASAP LogoCompany Logo Auction Link (800) 853-2651

Shop Now

   Allis Chalmers Case Farmall IH Ford 8N,9N,2N Ford
   Ferguson John Deere Massey Ferguson Minn. Moline Oliver

Crawlers, Dozers, Loaders & Backhoes Discussion Forum

Cat 855

Welcome Guest, Log in or Register
Author 
RLFox

11-21-2007 17:59:04




Report to Moderator

Anyone had an experience with a Cat 855? I"m thinking about buying one, and just need to know if they're generally a good machine. I think this one is a 1976 with recent overhaul on the engine and undercarriage, for around $20K. Can they be used to push trees? If so how big diameter? Thanks!




[Log in to Reply]   [No Email]
Billy NY

11-21-2007 18:29:42




Report to Moderator
 Re: Cat 855 in reply to RLFox, 11-21-2007 17:59:04  
From an operators opinion, the 955 crawler loaders were a good machine, I'm familiar with early 70's and up models, that one and the 977L, was fortunate to have been on several of each in good working condition, and aside from the mechanical and repair aspects of them, it was not very often besides regular maintenance that these gave much trouble.

I did a lot of clearing with the 955 H I thought it was, forgot the sequence of the series of these, not bad for msot work, you can get higher pushing leverage than a dozer, can dig around the base of the tree, it can be a productive machine in the hands of an experienced operator. The work I did was in south jersey, mostly sandy soils and pines, some hardwoods, used to clear easements before the pipe crew came in to install pipe and other utilities. I was a new hire and it was funny how they decided to see what kind of operator I was, by putting me on the first machine the company ever owned, they had 80 pieces at that time. I did all kinds of work with it, it had a fresh motor in it, new U/C, loaded trucks, cleared trees and brush, not a bad choice, a 4 in one bucket would be nice too.

Not the easiest thing to grade with, track frames are fixed, the don't contour to uneven ground like ones that oscillate, so they're harder to fine grade than a dozer, but you learn to work with it, just takes longer.

With tree clearing and similar work, you've got to be aware of the fact that it's very dangerous work or can be, the machine needs to have a R.O.P.S. - roll over protective structure on it, seatbelt and necessary operator protection from falling limbs as well as other protruding limbs. The last one I ran just had a weather cab ! No protection, I did quite a bit of clearing with it though, for some reason they kept me on it for quite awhile specifically for the clearing tasks.

I can't quite say I know much about the mechanics of them, but from what I saw, they were quite reliable, yet I'd not know how to deal with the loader frame for making repairs, not much room to work with. When contemplating spending that kind of money, make sure you know what you are getting, was the undercarriage measured to be new or is that just what the seller says, I'd want to get it up to operating temperature and check it out thoroughly, like most equipment, it's good to run it before buying if at all possible.

[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
Chuck NH

11-21-2007 18:15:55




Report to Moderator
 Re: Cat 855 in reply to RLFox, 11-21-2007 17:59:04  
Never heard of a Cat 855 machine! I think John Deere made an 855 track loader (D6 size machine). You mentioned it has an undercarriage, so could you possabily mean a 983 track loader if it's caterpillar? A 983 is a monster of a machine. You'll need deep pockets if you have a failure with that one.



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
135 Fan

11-22-2007 12:12:59




Report to Moderator
 Re: Cat 855 in reply to Chuck NH, 11-21-2007 18:15:55  
An 855 is a loader version of an 850 dozer. I think Case makes a respectable machine. An 855 JD is way bigger and hydrostatic. An 855 JD is bigger than a D6. More in line with a 977 loader but a lot more productive. Dave



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
135 Fan

11-22-2007 12:16:21




Report to Moderator
 Re: Cat 855 in reply to 135 Fan, 11-22-2007 12:12:59  
I didn't realize it said Cat 855. It would probably be a 955L if it's 1976. They were popular machines. Dave



[Log in to Reply]  [No Email]
[Options]  [Printer Friendly]  [Posting Help]  [Return to Forum]   [Log in to Reply]

Hop to:


TRACTOR PARTS TRACTOR MANUALS
We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]

Home  |  Forums


Copyright © 1997-2023 Yesterday's Tractor Co.

All Rights Reserved. Reproduction of any part of this website, including design and content, without written permission is strictly prohibited. Trade Marks and Trade Names contained and used in this Website are those of others, and are used in this Website in a descriptive sense to refer to the products of others. Use of this Web site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy

TRADEMARK DISCLAIMER: Tradenames and Trademarks referred to within Yesterday's Tractor Co. products and within the Yesterday's Tractor Co. websites are the property of their respective trademark holders. None of these trademark holders are affiliated with Yesterday's Tractor Co., our products, or our website nor are we sponsored by them. John Deere and its logos are the registered trademarks of the John Deere Corporation. Agco, Agco Allis, White, Massey Ferguson and their logos are the registered trademarks of AGCO Corporation. Case, Case-IH, Farmall, International Harvester, New Holland and their logos are registered trademarks of CNH Global N.V.

Yesterday's Tractors - Antique Tractor Headquarters

Website Accessibility Policy