Pulling in the next few years.

Pullers back then are still mad about a Farmall H that wouldnt quit. A little H that had the reputation of go big or go home. Its a small tractor, but it sure thought it was a big tractor,,,, the way it out pulled its competition. Everybody thinks that we took this POS H, and fixed it up,,,, but, really, Wilder fixed us.

Im returning the favor, this year. If you did not like that H then, you sure as heck aint gonna like it now, and Im ready to hear Wilder run again. That was our flagship of the tractorshop,,,, and soon, everybody is gonna know why that is,,,,

A friend of mine inspired me to put the H back together, sooner than I thought,, but, I see alot of potential in this kid,, willing to learn, and gets his hands dirty. So with all that in mind,, My H, is gonna run, at the same time his Super H is gonna run. One day we said we would get the two tractors together at one pull and have fun. And I think I can do that!

No, your not going to see me in any booth,, at any pull. Pullers know where and how to find me, so I have no need to put Wilder on Display in somebody elses bulding but my own on our dyno, a PTO dyno and you betcha,, at 540. We tell it like it is, and if you dont like, go somewhere else. And we have had to tell people that before,,,,we dont like to,, but nothing else to do,,, and we dont do "easy recommending".

Late last year, I got told in front of group of pullers, that our tractors are lawn mowers, and we need to get over whats gonna happen,,, Well, the lawn mowers been taken off!! And to the fella that said it,,,, wasnt it that H,,, that little H farmll that Whooped on your big Moline and cost you a points championship a few years ago???? So close, but second place sucks, and thats all your gonna see when I get Something Wilder, staged on that blue sled.

Message sent,,,, wating for the reply,,,,,

Lastly,, the magic springs,,,, this is so darn funny I cant type it,, but we have offically named the spring,,,

"The Original,Magic Governor Spring" Comes with its own magic wand and everything!! So you old pullers outhere,,, better watch it,, cause your gonna get turned into a goon!!

You fellow H pullers outhere,, the first KING OF THE HILL at USAP was won by a H. Dont surprize me one bit,,,, does it fellas???

You guys keep doing what your doing,, stay focused on pulling, keep your eyes open, and haul the load. Have fun. ChadS

or Force equals mass times acceleration.

So if you lighten the pistons...all else remaining equal...the force at the crankshaft is less. BUT...since the lighter pistons DO have less mass, they accelerate faster from the same combustion force. So the result at the crankshaft is going to be the same, whether the pistons are heavier or lighter.

BUT...since lighter pistons accelerate quicker, they also DEcelerate quicker, as the lower piston weight carries less intertia [from Newton's first law of motion]. So a heavier piston might just carry an advantage in an RPM-limited class when coming to the end of a pull, although I'm not sure whether such an advantage might be measured in feet or rather in mere inches.

I have been trying to send you a email to your chads@hotmail.com and it keeps coming back. I have a couple questions for you in reguards to my project !

"AND" never mind these A-holes .

opions are like A -holes theres to many ..

I have no problem with people doing things different or trying new stuff. You say your math works for you. BUT HOW DOES IT WORK WHEN YOU GET A COMPLETLEY DIFFERENT ANSWER!?!? That is the same as 99.9% of the world saying 2+2=4, and then you say 2+2=3.47, and you think you are right and the other 99.9% of the world is wrong. And when you were told in the thread I posted earlier that you were wrong, you werent just told you were wrong. It was explained how you were wrong and how to do it correctly. Granted, some people cut you down, say you are wrong, and leave it at that. Its completely different when someone tells you that you are wrong, says why you are wrong with examples, and then explains the correct way to do it. Are you so hard headed that you simply cant/wont listen to someone trying to explain....HELP YOU with something?? You took age old ways of calculating horsepower, changed it, came up with a totally different answer, and claim YOUR way is the right way. I dont get it.

Its the same thing with your theory of heavier pistons and rods making horsepower. YOU think you are right, even after several people reply to your post and disagree with you, citing the same laws of physics that have been around for many, many years. So who is right; a bunch of physicists who have studied physics over a number of years and agree on the basic laws of physics....OR....some guy from Indiana with a H-Farmall and a dyno?

What was the point supposed to be with the story about the JD US-A?

I still wish to continue my objection on a pto dyno result and a cell dyno result,,, they wont be the same.

I read somewhere,,,, on a ford 331 ci stroker. Making 530 hp and only have 386.5 ft lbs of torque. Naturally aspirated. HP is a factor of torque and rpm. Place the torque up in the rev range, and HP will be gained in abundance.

They reved this little ford up to 7200 rpm, at 5200 rpm, they got 383 hp 386 ft lbs of torque, 6200 rpm, 456 hp, and 386 ft lbs of torque, now scearm it to 7200 rpm, 530 hp, and still 386 ft lbs of torque.

The torque curve stayed consistant thru the rpm range, but the HP skyrocketed with rpm. The thing about it is,, if thats compared to a factory producion crate engine, rated for normal usage, it would be rated for the lower rpm level,, mainly what,, a 5500 redline for this engine,,,,, at 5200 its 383hp. the redline factor is the rpm keeps changing, the torque stays the same, but the HP is out of sight. but, the lower rpm speeds tell the real tale,,,,

which brings me back to why I was so ticked off in the first place in that discussion,,,,

RATED RPM. FACT.... you can rev an engine up as high as you can go inthe chassis, but you cant test the higher rpms hp on a pto dyno. the way the pto dyno works, that will not be allowed,,,,, the reading on the pto dyno is always gonna be lower than rated rpm pto speed at higher rpm,,,,, thats the way the dyno works in this case,,, or in may case,,, LOL!!

Im redlined at rated rpm for HP testing. My dyno reads hp at 540, pto speed, which means the harder I pull it down the lower the rpms go,, and the higher the HP reading go on the guage. This gives me the rpm ranges from stall speed to what ever the chassis gives me for the engine speed at 540 pto speed. the readings are higher as rpm drops, below 540,,, above 540 and its gonna read lower,, not enough pressure to show a load,, thats the weak link,,, in testing higher rpm on a 540 scale dyno,,,, now, flop the shaft over and run it on the 1000 rpm side,,, dont know what it would be,,, but you should be able to test it at the higher speed, if your engine can spin the 540 pto fast enough to get an accurate reading.

Now this is two topics in this discussion,, I know the pto story, but were talking about the physics of the magic, of rpm.

ChadS ChadS3@hotmail.com

you know the typical disclaimer,, right,, but have seen that design work well on IH chassis. The strangest hitch Ive ever seen though,,,, was an IH drawbar assembly mounted up to a JD and pulled off the axles instead of the lower half of the rear end housing,,,, like a farmall does. That must work or something,, cuase it sure does make the JD pull pretty good. Beats all I never saw though,,,,, LOL! test em tune em,, but dont let somebody be stupid and break one on purpose,,, you know the limtations of your design, so be known what its capable of. JMHO. ChadS