Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: kingpin torque

Posted by mj on December 27, 2002 at 22:43:56 from (63.166.116.108):

In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: kingpin torque posted by You Are Not Wrong! - Rod (NH) on December 27, 2002 at 16:26:06:

You are right when you say that the example I
gave (2 ft. arm & 10 lb. scale reading) would
yield 20 ft/lbs of torque so the scale reading at
2 ft. should be multiplied instead of divided.
You may also be right when you say that you
have never seen ft-lb expressed as ft/lb
before. You did know, however, the intent of
the two abreveations joined by the hash mark
(back slash), right? The reason I use the
hash instead of the dash is really quite simple
------IT (the HASH) IS CLOSER TO MY
FINGERS THAN THE DASH! Go figure.

Follow Ups:

Post A Followup Name: E-Mail: Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: kingpin torque Comments: Optional Link URL: Link Title: Optional Image URL: Email Notification: If you check this box, email will be sent to you whenever someone replies to this message. Your email address must be entered above to receive notification. This notification will be cancelled automatically after 2 weeks.

TRACTOR PARTS	TRACTOR MANUALS

We sell tractor parts!  We have the parts you need to repair your tractor - the right parts. Our low prices and years of research make us your best choice when you need parts. Shop Online Today. [ About Us ]